2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2021.102337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of fin structures for phase change material (PCM) melting process in rectangular cavities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Code validation is also performed. Figure 4 shows the melting fraction comparisons considering different time instances with the values available in the results of De Césaro Oliveski et al (2021). They used fins with aspect ratio of 0.013 while 343 K was used as the wall boundary condition.…”
Section: Solution Methods and Code Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Code validation is also performed. Figure 4 shows the melting fraction comparisons considering different time instances with the values available in the results of De Césaro Oliveski et al (2021). They used fins with aspect ratio of 0.013 while 343 K was used as the wall boundary condition.…”
Section: Solution Methods and Code Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following governing equations, continuity, momentum and energy are used in the computational model, respectively, (De Césaro Oliveski et al , 2021 and Bouzennada et al , 2021) as: where ρ, V, P, g, ß, H, T and t are, respectively, the density, velocity, pressure, gravity, thermal expansion coefficient, enthalpy, temperature, time, whereas u c is fluid velocity. Here, trueS denotes the porosity function's source term ( S=(1f)2(f3+ε)CV) with C as the mushy zone morphology constant (Brent et al , 1988).…”
Section: Computational Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations