1998
DOI: 10.1109/81.660756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of FIR Hilbert transformers and differentiators in the complex domain

Abstract: This paper presents a method for the design of FIR Hilbert transformers and differentiators in the complex domain. The method can be used to obtain conjugate-symmetric designs with smaller group delay compared to linear-phase designs. Non-conjugate symmetric Hilbert transformers are also designed. This paper is an extension of our previous work [1], which presented the algorithm for the design of standard frequency selective filters. The minimax criterion is used and the Chebychev approximation is posed as a l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because its frequency response stretches across the entire spectrum, digital realization requires an approximation. Three main approaches can be found in the literature [48,49]: complex filters, which require complex and computationally expensive hardware multipliers; the combination of two filters that form 90 • , which are commonly implemented as delayed band-pass infinite impulse response (IIR) filters variables, which deteriorate PLL performance; and finite impulse response (FIR) filters, which require the real part to be delayed to adjust the relative phases of in-phase and quadrature signals. The latter approach is the preferred method for PLLs in grid-connected converters [40,41,50].…”
Section: Pll Based On Hilbert Transformmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because its frequency response stretches across the entire spectrum, digital realization requires an approximation. Three main approaches can be found in the literature [48,49]: complex filters, which require complex and computationally expensive hardware multipliers; the combination of two filters that form 90 • , which are commonly implemented as delayed band-pass infinite impulse response (IIR) filters variables, which deteriorate PLL performance; and finite impulse response (FIR) filters, which require the real part to be delayed to adjust the relative phases of in-phase and quadrature signals. The latter approach is the preferred method for PLLs in grid-connected converters [40,41,50].…”
Section: Pll Based On Hilbert Transformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter approach is the preferred method for PLLs in grid-connected converters [40,41,50]. The type III and IV FIR filters can be applied as for the generation of the quadrature signal [51], but the necessary multiplications in type III are half those in type IV [49].…”
Section: Pll Based On Hilbert Transformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it should be noted that can be any low-order Hilbert transformer implemented using any structure such as those in [25]- [27] and can be designed independent on and . The frequency responses of and are than optimized as a correction term to sharpen the frequency response of the overall filter.…”
Section: With Special Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the sample with the steepest slope in the vicinity of the rise edge is considered for the computation of the line that passes through and and the zero crossing of the interpolated line with the base level computed as shown in (6). (6) The previous expression can also be reformulated as a pulse filter plus interpolation to compute the crossing point with the base line, as shown in (7), taking into account that is a discrete differentiator [14].…”
Section: Linear Interpolationmentioning
confidence: 99%