Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control 2006
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2006.376707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of H<sub>&#x0221E;</sub> Gain-Scheduled Controllers for Linear Time-Varying Systems by means of Polynomial Lyapunov Functions

Abstract: This paper proposes convex conditions to design parameter-dependent (i.e. gain-scheduled) state feedback controllers that ensure closed-loop stability with H ∞ performance for linear systems affected by time-varying parameters that belong to a polytope and have bounded time-derivatives. The conditions, based on homogeneous polynomially parameterdependent Lyapunov functions of arbitrary degree, are expressed as a set of linear matrix inequalities written in terms of the vertices of the polytope, the bounds on t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is also known that the static output feedback design is not feasible since products of variables C d (t), C v (t) and P(t) appear in (13) except the case of the full states being available [7]. In order to overcome this difficulty, we specify the problem to the mechanical system (1) and propose to make the Lyapunov matrix P(t) in (13) as…”
Section: Lmi Conditions For Stability and Optimality A Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, it is also known that the static output feedback design is not feasible since products of variables C d (t), C v (t) and P(t) appear in (13) except the case of the full states being available [7]. In order to overcome this difficulty, we specify the problem to the mechanical system (1) and propose to make the Lyapunov matrix P(t) in (13) as…”
Section: Lmi Conditions For Stability and Optimality A Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…which is developed for the general LTV systems based on the assumption of all states being available [7]. The optimal controller results in γ 2 = 2.34.…”
Section: B State Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In principle, one may think of avoiding the gridding procedure, as there exist approaches in the LPV literature which formulate the stability analysis problem as a feasibility LMI problem of finite dimension, see, e.g., [38]- [41]. To do this, however, the LPV system must be written either as a linear fractional representation (LFR) or as an affine LPV system.…”
Section: Stability Analysis and Lpv Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the robust H 2 or H ∞ controller synthesis problems, the gain-scheduling control approaches have been extensively studied for LPV systems; see, e.g. references [28,30,44,45] for the robust H ∞ control and references [30,31,46] of the gain-scheduling control for LPV systems, and little progress has been made to improve the robust stabilization of LTI systems [40] in terms of conservatism until very recent years. Recently, the concept of the new kinds of controllers with finite memory structures [47][48][49][50][51] opened up a new possibility of reducing the conservatism of approaches based on the static state-feedback control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%