2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.aeue.2022.154308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of high stability, low power and high speed 12 T SRAM cell in 32-nm CNTFET technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17 A CNT shows either metallic or semiconducting properties based on the chirality vector (n, m), where both n and m are integers. 5 For n = m or n-m = 3i, where i is an integer, a CNT is metallic, and otherwise, it is semiconducting. 4 The CNT diameter (D CNT ) is calculated by Eq.…”
Section: Carbon Nanotube Field-effect Transistor (Cntfet)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…17 A CNT shows either metallic or semiconducting properties based on the chirality vector (n, m), where both n and m are integers. 5 For n = m or n-m = 3i, where i is an integer, a CNT is metallic, and otherwise, it is semiconducting. 4 The CNT diameter (D CNT ) is calculated by Eq.…”
Section: Carbon Nanotube Field-effect Transistor (Cntfet)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Moreover, CNTFET has high mobility, high ON-to-OFF currents ratio (I ON /I OFF ), and good transconductance, consumes low power, and mitigates parametric variations. 5 Due to these reasons, CNTFET is the best candidate to design power/energy-efficient digital circuits. 4 To further improve the power/energy efficiency in a digital circuit, the use of multiple-valued logic (MVL) is the best way because it uses more than two logical values for computations compared to binary logic.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, there is a need to look for different potential alternatives to CMOS. It is found that carbon nanotube field‐effect transistors (CNTFET) and graphene nanoribbon field‐effect transistors (GNRFET) have a higher power of switch, curves with more ideal voltage, and better mobility, consequently, they can be favorable replacements for CMOS 11–14 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is found that carbon nanotube field-effect transistors (CNTFET) and graphene nanoribbon field-effect transistors (GNRFET) have a higher power of switch, curves with more ideal voltage, and better mobility, consequently, they can be favorable replacements for CMOS. [11][12][13][14] GNRFET, unlike CNTFET, is compatible with the existing CMOS manufacturing technologies. CNTFET has alignment and transfer-related issues, which can be resolved by GNRFET.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7] These problems reduce the suitability of the MOSFET for power/energy-efficient applications. 5 In response, researchers have proposed various new alternative solutions and technologies to traditional MOSFET technology, such as fin-based FET (FinFET), [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] carbon nanotube-based FET (CNTFET), 6,7,15,16 and graphene nanoribbon-based FET (GNRFET). 4,[17][18][19] Among these emerging technologies, GNRFET offers excellent properties and is compatible with existing silicon-based MOSFET, and is an attractive option for achieving higher performance and efficiency in future electronic devices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%