2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.139544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of hyper-cross-linked polymers with tunable polarity for effective preconcentration of aflatoxins in grain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The C 1s spectrum was deconvoluted into four peaks (Figure b), corresponding to CC (C–C), CN, C–N, and C–F, and their binding energies were 284.3, 287.8, 285.0, and 286.1 eV, respectively. , The N 1s spectrum was deconvoluted into two peaks of CN–C (399.3 eV) and NH– (400.0 eV) (Figure c) . The XPS spectrum of O 1s (Figure d) exhibited two peaks at 529.7 and 531.2 eV, which were attributed to Fe–O and Fe–O–C, respectively . The appearance of Fe–O–C confirmed that Fe 3 O 4 was covalently bonded with F-POP through the Fe–O–C bond .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The C 1s spectrum was deconvoluted into four peaks (Figure b), corresponding to CC (C–C), CN, C–N, and C–F, and their binding energies were 284.3, 287.8, 285.0, and 286.1 eV, respectively. , The N 1s spectrum was deconvoluted into two peaks of CN–C (399.3 eV) and NH– (400.0 eV) (Figure c) . The XPS spectrum of O 1s (Figure d) exhibited two peaks at 529.7 and 531.2 eV, which were attributed to Fe–O and Fe–O–C, respectively . The appearance of Fe–O–C confirmed that Fe 3 O 4 was covalently bonded with F-POP through the Fe–O–C bond .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 The XPS spectrum of O 1s (Figure 4d) exhibited two peaks at 529.7 and 531.2 eV, which were attributed to Fe−O and Fe−O−C, respectively. 38 The appearance of Fe−O−C confirmed that Fe 3 O 4 was covalently bonded with F-POP through the Fe−O−C bond. 38 The C−F in the −CF 3 group appeared at 689 eV (Figure 4e).…”
Section: Characterization Of M-f-popmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the emergence of new technologies and novel materials, sample pretreatment methods are also developing. Table S2 [ 11 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , …”
Section: Sample Pretreatment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, magnetic adsorbent is the most important part in MSPE, which directly determines the extraction efficiency and time. Therefore, more and more researchers focus on the synthesis of novel and efficient magnetic adsorbents, such as magnetic covalent organic frameworks (MCOFs) (Fe 3 O 4 /COF-TpBD [ 41 ], Fe 3 O 4 @COF(TFPB-PPD) [ 23 ]), magnetic metal organic frameworks (MOFs) (MIL-101(Cr)@Fe 3 O 4 [ 45 ], Fe 3 O 4 @UiO-66-NH 2 @MON [ 24 ]), magnetic carbon nanotubes (M-CNTs) (PDA@Fe 3 O 4 -MWCNTs [ 64 ], MWCNT-MNPs [ 42 ]), magnetic hyper-crosslinked polymers (MHCP) ((MHCP-TPE) [ 21 ], M-OP10-DCX [ 22 ]), and others (Fe 3 O 4 @SiO 2 @TiO 2 -APTMS-CPA [ 82 ], Fe 3 O 4 @POSS@PIL-PSt [ 33 ]). The main analytical parameters of MSPE on the pretreatment of mycotoxins is shown in Table 2 .…”
Section: Sample Pretreatment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%