2022 8th International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/codit55151.2022.9803884
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of LQR Controller for 3D Trajectory Tracking of Octocopter Unmanned Aerial Vehicle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…World field scholars have designed various controllers for UAVs, classical methods including Proportional Integral Derivative (PID), Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR), Backstepping controller, and Sliding Mode Control (SMC) have been widely used in quadcopters, but each type has its pros and cons, for instance, PID controller can stabilize the position of quadcopters and successfully eliminate errors in steady state [23], but in cases with disturbance, its lengthy adjustment time, big overshoot, and large steady-state error are non-negligible disadvantages [24]. Compared with PID, LQR owns a better robustness in controlling UAV's position and orientation coordinates but its response is slower [25]. Backstepping controller has excellent tracking performance, rapid adjustment, good adaptability in handling underactuation problem with rigid negative feedback form [26], but its performance is inferior to SMC as it has difficulties in estimating variations in uncertainties and external disturbances [27].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…World field scholars have designed various controllers for UAVs, classical methods including Proportional Integral Derivative (PID), Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR), Backstepping controller, and Sliding Mode Control (SMC) have been widely used in quadcopters, but each type has its pros and cons, for instance, PID controller can stabilize the position of quadcopters and successfully eliminate errors in steady state [23], but in cases with disturbance, its lengthy adjustment time, big overshoot, and large steady-state error are non-negligible disadvantages [24]. Compared with PID, LQR owns a better robustness in controlling UAV's position and orientation coordinates but its response is slower [25]. Backstepping controller has excellent tracking performance, rapid adjustment, good adaptability in handling underactuation problem with rigid negative feedback form [26], but its performance is inferior to SMC as it has difficulties in estimating variations in uncertainties and external disturbances [27].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of these aspects is positioning the UAV or tracking the desired trajectory under high uncertainty. Considering the trajectory tracking part, linear and nonlinear controllers have been applied to UAVs [7], [11], [16], [33], [34]. However, observing or detecting the UAV's position is another challenging problem in a real-time system because of the uncertain nature of its components, such as sensor quality and communication latency [22], [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%