2019 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/radar.2019.8835842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of mutually incoherent arrays for DoA estimation via group-sparse reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to have a higher angular resolution, a narrower MLW becomes more attractive. Generally speaking, there is a parametric trade-off between MLW and SLL [22], and we expect most of the results to lie on the SLL-MLW Pareto front boundary [24], which is the state at which resources in a given system are optimized in a way that one dimension cannot improve without the second worsening [40]. Moreover, Algorithm 1 and Algorithm 2 have difficulties in parameter selection.…”
Section: B Algorithm 2: Mlw Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to have a higher angular resolution, a narrower MLW becomes more attractive. Generally speaking, there is a parametric trade-off between MLW and SLL [22], and we expect most of the results to lie on the SLL-MLW Pareto front boundary [24], which is the state at which resources in a given system are optimized in a way that one dimension cannot improve without the second worsening [40]. Moreover, Algorithm 1 and Algorithm 2 have difficulties in parameter selection.…”
Section: B Algorithm 2: Mlw Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the constraints of array element spacing, heuristic algorithms have to filter the solutions at each iteration, which leads to decrease in both accuracy and speed. Moreover, it is worth noting that the SLL and MLW are usually trade-offs to be made in the optimization, as illustrated by studies in [22], [24]. Their objective functions often contain multiple metrics weighted together, like αSLL + βMLW, essentially turning the constrained optimization problem into an unconstrained one, which can then be readily solved by heuristic algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Group-sparse reconstruction has been used for radar signal processing, including incoherent sensor fusion in multi-static ISAR [8], passive radar networks [9], tracking [10], and timefrequency estimation [11]. In other work of the authors [13], a design principle based on group-sparse reconstruction is exploited for optimization of antenna positions of mutually incoherent apertures with the effect of sidelobe averaging while maintaining a thin mainlobe with a most efficient use of space available.…”
Section: Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [11], the authors approach the antenna placement for direction of arrival (DOA) estimation using a CS-based collocated MIMO radar with a reduced number of elements, by bounding the coherence of the resulting matrix. In [12], [13], the authors have suggested a sparse array design based on optimising the Ambiguity function using global optimiser and have conducted an extensive study on comparing arrays of different number of elements and different field of views. The authors in [14] consider the task of antenna placement for a CS-based collocated MIMO radar with linear arrays; they obtain a probability distribution for selecting the antenna locations and also suggest an antenna selection procedure from the distribution that yields an array configuration that results in a sensing matrix of low mutual coherence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%