2002
DOI: 10.1021/ja027895v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of Novel Inorganic−Organic Hybrid Materials Based on Iron-Chloranilate Mononuclear Complexes:  Characteristics of Hydrogen-Bond-Supported Layers toward the Intercalation of Guests

Abstract: Novel intercalation compounds constructed from the common two-dimensional hydrogen-bond-supported layers and functional guests [(H(0.5)phz)(2)[Fe(CA)(2)(H(2)O)(2)].2H(2)O](n)(1), ([Fe(Cp)(2)][Fe(CA)(2)(H(2)O)(2)])(n)(2), ([Fe(Cp*)(2)][Fe(CA)(2)(H(2)O)(2)])(n)(3), and [(TTF)(2)[Fe(CA)(2)(H(2)O)(2)]](n)(4) (H(2)CA = chloranilic acid, phz = phenazine, [Fe(Cp)(2)] = ferrocene, [Fe(Cp*)(2)] = decamethylferrocene, TTF = tetrathiafulvalene) are described. The guest cations are introduced between the ([Fe(CA)(2)(H(2)O… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
17
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
5
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, upon reduction of 1 to 2 , the mean Fe–O bond distance increases slightly from 2.020(4) to 2.028(5) Å, although these values fall within error of one another. In both compounds, this distance can be unambiguously assigned to high-spin Fe III . , Within the bridging ligand, the mean C–C bond distance in 1 is 1.6% shorter than that in 3 , while the C–O distance is 2.9% longer in 1 . This observation is consistent with the presence of exclusively L 2– in 3 , which is therefore formulated to contain [Zn II 2 (L 2– ) 3 ] 2– , and an average of one L 2– and two L 3–• in 1 , formulated as [Fe III 2 (L 2– )­(L 3–• ) 2 ] 2– .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…First, upon reduction of 1 to 2 , the mean Fe–O bond distance increases slightly from 2.020(4) to 2.028(5) Å, although these values fall within error of one another. In both compounds, this distance can be unambiguously assigned to high-spin Fe III . , Within the bridging ligand, the mean C–C bond distance in 1 is 1.6% shorter than that in 3 , while the C–O distance is 2.9% longer in 1 . This observation is consistent with the presence of exclusively L 2– in 3 , which is therefore formulated to contain [Zn II 2 (L 2– ) 3 ] 2– , and an average of one L 2– and two L 3–• in 1 , formulated as [Fe III 2 (L 2– )­(L 3–• ) 2 ] 2– .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The solution-based exfoliation procedure is less effective in the neutral coordination polymers which can be completely delaminated (with a thickness ca. 1-1.5 nm) [115,170,[176][177][178][179][180][181][182][183]. The stronger interlayer interactions in these hybrid compounds compared with the weaker van der Waals interactions observed in neutral 2D coordination polymers could be responsible of the lower degree of exfoliation.…”
Section: Spin-crossover Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that the chloranilate (CA) ligand and its homologues, which contain two chelating coordination sites, are capable of bridging metal centers to form monomeric molecules, chains, sheets, or 3D structures 37,39−47. Studies based on CA‐containing magneto‐networks have also been carried out with respect to the propagation of magnetic superexchange interactions between the paramagnetic metal centers through the CA bridges 37,39−47. The benefits derived from the phenazine ligand are twofold.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%