2015 4th International Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/intee.2015.7416728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of robust LQR control for DC-DC multilevel boost converter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ref. [31] covers the deduction of the (LQR) and that induction won't be repeated here. In any case, the essential issue is to limit some quadratic cost work This type of controller needs a pre-filter to cancel the offset between the input and the output.…”
Section: Lqr Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ref. [31] covers the deduction of the (LQR) and that induction won't be repeated here. In any case, the essential issue is to limit some quadratic cost work This type of controller needs a pre-filter to cancel the offset between the input and the output.…”
Section: Lqr Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For many control circuits, the presence of a steady-state fault is an additional problem. In the literature, many advanced non-linear and optimal control strategies, such as linear quadratic controller, sliding mode controller (SMC), H-infinity, or feedback linearisation, have been published to achieve a good closed-loop performance of the flyback converter (Bouziane et al, 2015;Mandal and Mishra, 2018;Prasad and Kumar, 2018). Taking into account our previous results, feedback linearisation has been applied to nonisolated converters with good results: the method has been transformed into a framework and the modifications have improved the dynamic behaviour and minimised the steady-state error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From control aspects, most power converters have non-linear behavior, and unstable internal dynamics [7], which leads to a more complicated control design. Many linear and non-linear control methods such as proportional-integral (PI) controllers [8], linear quadratic controllers (LQR) [9], sliding mode controllers (SMC) [10], H∞ controllers [11], or feedback linearization (FBL) [12] can be applied to achieve a good closed-loop performance of switching converter. The design and implementation of a PI controller are straightforward.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%