2017
DOI: 10.15598/aeee.v15i2.2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of Sensor Systems for Long Time Electrodermal Activity Monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Van der Mee 2021 (Van der Mee et al 2021) found modest but significant within-subject correlations between palm-based and wrist-based EDA (r=0.31 for SCL and r=0.42 for non-specific SCRs). Vavrinsky et al (2017) developed an 'EDA ring' for integration into smart clothes, and Torniainen et al (2015) demonstrated that a small ring sensor could obtain recordings similar to a laboratory-grade finger EDA measurement, obtaining an average cosine similarity of 83%. For sensor applications integrated into shoes or socks, EDA at the feet correlate well with palmar EDA (Kappeler-Setz et al 2013, Kasos et al 2019, Sanchez-Comas et al 2021.…”
Section: Skin Sites For Wearable Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Van der Mee 2021 (Van der Mee et al 2021) found modest but significant within-subject correlations between palm-based and wrist-based EDA (r=0.31 for SCL and r=0.42 for non-specific SCRs). Vavrinsky et al (2017) developed an 'EDA ring' for integration into smart clothes, and Torniainen et al (2015) demonstrated that a small ring sensor could obtain recordings similar to a laboratory-grade finger EDA measurement, obtaining an average cosine similarity of 83%. For sensor applications integrated into shoes or socks, EDA at the feet correlate well with palmar EDA (Kappeler-Setz et al 2013, Kasos et al 2019, Sanchez-Comas et al 2021.…”
Section: Skin Sites For Wearable Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We tried to avoid these problems by constructing an EDA Holter in the form of a practical ring [124] (Figure 8), which does not sense the EDA between the fingers like a conventional device, but locally on a small place in an area of 1 x 1 cm (Figure 9a). Such an EDA ring is more suitable for daily wear and the signal artifacts are lower.…”
Section: Electrodermal Activity (Eda)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, there are three main problems: foreign-body sensation when wearing, requiring calibration, and data drift. One reason for the widespread use of inertial sensor units (IMUs) is that wearing foreign body sensations is severely constrained, and researchers are looking for ways to collect physiological data in ways that make subjects more comfortable [12,13]. In recent years, the use of intelligent wearable sensors with integrated flexible sensors to monitor human health state has aroused widespread interest [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%