1996
DOI: 10.1016/0020-7683(95)00259-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of simple low order finite elements for large strain analysis of nearly incompressible solids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
279
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 352 publications
(288 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
8
279
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem was initially presented by Nagtegaal et al [23] for small strain plasticity to demonstrate the spurious response of standard finite elements and was subsequently reanalysed in a number of papers [28,31,33]. The plate had a Young's modulus of 206.9GPa, Poisson's ratio of 0.29 and was modelled using an elastic-perfectly plastic Prandtl-Reuss constitutive model with yield stress of ρ y = 0.45GPa.…”
Section: Notched Platementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem was initially presented by Nagtegaal et al [23] for small strain plasticity to demonstrate the spurious response of standard finite elements and was subsequently reanalysed in a number of papers [28,31,33]. The plate had a Young's modulus of 206.9GPa, Poisson's ratio of 0.29 and was modelled using an elastic-perfectly plastic Prandtl-Reuss constitutive model with yield stress of ρ y = 0.45GPa.…”
Section: Notched Platementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, as referred by de Souza Neto et al [31] there is an inherent inability in the interpolation functions in the correct representation of isochoric displacement ÿelds.…”
Section: Incompressibility and Lockingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kinematically, it is possible to locally decompose the deformation gradient in a distortional term and a dilatational term (as in Reference [31]). This type of decomposition can be specially useful when there is the intent of deÿning distinct interpolations for these two terms, as it is the case in this paper.…”
Section: Incompressibility and Lockingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among others, the class of mixed variational methods developed by Simo et al (1985), the mixed u/p formulation proposed by Sussman and Bathe (1987), the geometrically non-linear Bbar methodology introduced by Hughes et al (1975) and Moran et al (1990), the family of enhanced mixed finite element methods which include nonlinear version of the method of incompatible modes (Taylor et al, 1976) are presented in Simo and Armero (1992) and have been extended in Simo et al (1993), and the F-bar method proposed by Neto et al (1996) are noteworthy.…”
Section: B1 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%