2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of three-dimensional nanotube-fullerene-interconnected framework for hydrogen storage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[42] The results for adsorption enthalpy obtained by GCMCs are in agreement with recent research results. [21,[43][44][45] It can also be concluded from the change curve of adsorption enthalpy that, at fixed temperature, the adsorption enthalpy decreases gradually with an increase in pressure. At fixed pressure, as the temperature increases, the binding energy of hydrogen molecules will de-066803-4 crease and the hydrogen storage gravimetric ratio will also decrease.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[42] The results for adsorption enthalpy obtained by GCMCs are in agreement with recent research results. [21,[43][44][45] It can also be concluded from the change curve of adsorption enthalpy that, at fixed temperature, the adsorption enthalpy decreases gradually with an increase in pressure. At fixed pressure, as the temperature increases, the binding energy of hydrogen molecules will de-066803-4 crease and the hydrogen storage gravimetric ratio will also decrease.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include complicated desorption processes that require high temperatures ranging from 200˚C to 600˚C [5][6][7], as well as slow charge-discharge processes due to the inherent high activation energy required for chemical bond formation [8,9]. In contrast, physisorption materials are porous substances such as zeolite [10], carbon based materials [11][12][13][14][15][16], covalence organic frameworks (COFs) [17][18][19][20] and metal organic frameworks (MOFs) [21]. They are able to facilitate the diffusion of H 2 molecules into their pores, where they become attached to the pore surfaces through barrierless physical attractions such as Van der Waals and electrostatic interactions [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, physisorption materials are porous substances such as zeolite [10], carbon based materials [11][12][13][14][15][16], covalence organic frameworks (COFs) [17][18][19][20] and metal organic frameworks (MOFs) [21]. They are able to facilitate the diffusion of H 2 molecules into their pores, where they become attached to the pore surfaces through barrierless physical attractions such as Van der Waals and electrostatic interactions [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. These materials offer the advantage of fast charge-discharge processes due to the reversibility of physical adsorption [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%