2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of X-shaped double split tee joints accounting for moment–shear interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The connections consist of plates especially designed to yield under loading and dissipate the seismic energy. Some examples include: the PI damper connection (Koetaka et al, 2005), the slit damper connection (Chan and Albermani, 2008;Oh et al, 2009;Saffari et al, 2013), double split tee (DST) connections (Herrera et al, 2013;Bravo and Herrera, 2014;Latour and Rizzano, 2015;Tong et al, 2016), dissipative splice connections (Calado et al, 2013;Valente et al, 2017a,b), or connections with memory shape alloy bolts (Wang et al, 2015;Yam et al, 2015).…”
Section: Past Studies Regarding Classic Beam-to-column Connectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The connections consist of plates especially designed to yield under loading and dissipate the seismic energy. Some examples include: the PI damper connection (Koetaka et al, 2005), the slit damper connection (Chan and Albermani, 2008;Oh et al, 2009;Saffari et al, 2013), double split tee (DST) connections (Herrera et al, 2013;Bravo and Herrera, 2014;Latour and Rizzano, 2015;Tong et al, 2016), dissipative splice connections (Calado et al, 2013;Valente et al, 2017a,b), or connections with memory shape alloy bolts (Wang et al, 2015;Yam et al, 2015).…”
Section: Past Studies Regarding Classic Beam-to-column Connectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of double-tee profiles for the structural members of steel moment-resisting frames (MRFs) is widespread in Europe and the USA. This large use is due to the existence of reliable formulations able to predict, in a very accurate way, the mechanical behaviour of I- or H-shape members, but also to the possibility to adopt a wide range of easy-to-construct beam-to-column connections [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ]. Additionally, for most of the existing beam-to-column connection solutions, the flexural strength and stiffness can be accurately predicted by applying the component method [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Real scale tests have been pursued by some of us, in the framework of seismic response of structures [1,2]. On the other hand, FEM modelling has been performed by some of us, to evaluate damaging and breaking behaviour of steel and steel/concrete structures [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%