2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design optimisation for a low energy home in Sydney

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimization results in this study reveal that about 4 MJ/m 2 is saved every year. The results of another optimization study that using building energy simulation and optimization showed that it is possible to cost effectively reduce the space heating and cooling energy requirement of a new house in Sydney where the annual space energy requirement is less than 5 MJ/m 2 [38], but a photovoltaic system is sized to cover the remaining household electricity consumption over the course of a year. Combining optimum single-objective energy efficiency measures, the energy saving in the North-West of Algeriais is about 63.51% reduction of the original annual energy need [39], but it does not use the multi-dimensional optimization software and optimize the variables simultaneous.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimization results in this study reveal that about 4 MJ/m 2 is saved every year. The results of another optimization study that using building energy simulation and optimization showed that it is possible to cost effectively reduce the space heating and cooling energy requirement of a new house in Sydney where the annual space energy requirement is less than 5 MJ/m 2 [38], but a photovoltaic system is sized to cover the remaining household electricity consumption over the course of a year. Combining optimum single-objective energy efficiency measures, the energy saving in the North-West of Algeriais is about 63.51% reduction of the original annual energy need [39], but it does not use the multi-dimensional optimization software and optimize the variables simultaneous.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…low-energy buildings, passive houses, green buildings, net zero-energy buildings, zero-carbon buildings…). Design of high performance buildings using optimization techniques was studied by Wang et al [16; 17], Fesanghary et al [18], Bambrook et al [7], Castro-Lacouture et al [19] and many other researchers. Very high bonus points for energy saving in green building rating 1 Available at: www.thefreedictionary.com [Accessed 11 /4/2013] …”
Section: Figure 1: the Increased Trend Of Number Of Optimization Studmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, every time the air quality in the building must be taken under consideration -this is possible, in case of the low energy buildings, only through the airflow control and heat recovery. The use of multi-criteria optimization to choose solutions for energy-efficient buildings rate analyses the different permissible solutions can be found [14][15][16][17][38][39][40][41][42][43]. The multi-criteria analysis, proposed in this paper, allows for a classification of the alternative, technical solutions regarding HVAC systems and building itself designing taking under consideration: the economics, energy, environmental parameters in terms of complex energy-related optimum, keeping in the same time all limiting conditions.…”
Section: Increase Of Investment Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%