2016
DOI: 10.1109/lra.2016.2528294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design Principles for a Family of Direct-Drive Legged Robots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
195
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 273 publications
(196 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
195
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The spine is able to achieve a minimum hip-to-hip distance of 0.27m at maximum bending (20cm less than the hip-to-hip length at full extension), however for this work only moderate spine bending was used. The robot's legs consist of five-bar mechanisms driven by a pair of parallel direct-drive TMotor U8-16 brushless motors adapted from the design reported in [23].…”
Section: Quadrupedal Platformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spine is able to achieve a minimum hip-to-hip distance of 0.27m at maximum bending (20cm less than the hip-to-hip length at full extension), however for this work only moderate spine bending was used. The robot's legs consist of five-bar mechanisms driven by a pair of parallel direct-drive TMotor U8-16 brushless motors adapted from the design reported in [23].…”
Section: Quadrupedal Platformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We further limit our discussion to the class of direct-drive quadrupedal robots whose legs are actuated by DC electric motors (as exemplified by [3] whose drivetrain technology and principles of design are roughly adopted in the hips of our new, additionally spined robot to be introduced in the next section). These robots sacrifice potential motor output shaft torque for high actuator and leg linkage transparency, allowing motors to sense environmental forces and events like ground contact.…”
Section: Technical Approach: the Utility Of Core Actuationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 An established metric for evaluating the ability of a direct-drive limb to generate forces is thermal cost of force (for a normalized motor constant) given by the mean of the squared singular values of the forward kinematic Jacobian [14, page 48], [3]. As shown in the analysis above, in general smaller singular values are achievable by decreasing the length of lever arms in the (possibly parallel) kinematic chain to gain a greater mechanical advantage.…”
Section: Appendix 1: Analytic Leg Force Generation Versus Workpace Vmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations