better capture and storage systems. The essential criteria for such systems are their ability to capture short-lived and yet sharp voltage variations. In addition, such systems should also respond to stable input signals from the harvesters that comprise the remaining 80% of the total energy generated. [5,6] At a fundamental level, such stringent requirements translate to the holy grail of energy storage: high energy density and power density without compromising the lifetime. [7][8][9][10] Electrochemical double layer-based supercapacitors (EDLCs) operating on the basis of non-Faradic electrostatic charge build-up at the electrode-electrolyte interface and therefore exhibits high-rate capability, short relaxation time constant (τ), long lifetime, and high-power density compared to their Faradic counterparts. However, the low energy density and selfdischarge behavior of such systems severely restricts their usability in tandem with renewables. A variety of strategies based on three major approaches have been adopted to enhance the energy densities of the EDLCs without compromising on their advantages. The first and widely adopted approach comprises tuning the surface porosity, tortuosity, and electrical conductivity of the electrode materials to enhance the quantum of energy stored at the interface. [11][12][13][14][15] Given the mutual exclusivity between energy and power density, this approach has led to plateauing energy density or significantly enhanced energy density at the cost of lifetime and power density.The second approach is to utilize liquid electrolyte systems that exhibit inherently better ionic mobilities and electrochemical stability over wider operational voltage. This is often employed in conjunction with surface-engineered and morphologically tailored nanomaterials ranging from porous graphene, carbon-nanotube, biomass-derived hard carbon, and heteroatom-doped carbon. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] The third approach utilizes a combination of Faradic surface reactions and non-Faradic EDLCs to enhance the energy density. Pseudo-intercalative electrode materials such as MXenes have exhibited extremely high volumetric capacitance with liquid electrolytes. [25][26][27] All these approaches are predominantly confined to liquid electrolytes, where the enhanced energy density often comes at the expense of lowered power density and lifetime.With increased focus on miniaturized and portable storage energy systems, there has been a paradigm shift toward the Remarkable improvement in the polarization and charge transport at the solid-solid electrode-electrolyte interface due to the incorporation of a redox-active additive sodium molybdate (Na 2 MoO 4 ) is demonstrated. The presence of the electrochemically active oxide center along with Na + facilitates the hopping-based charge transport of the ionic liquid leading to higher ionic conductivity and a twofold increase in specific capacitance (0.009 to 0.018 F cm −2 ). This drives a 200% increase in the energy density (0.76-1.7 µW h cm −2 ) and a 2.5 t...