2018
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2018.0206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design principles of hair-like structures as biological machines

Abstract: Hair-like structures are prevalent throughout biology and frequently act to sense or alter interactions with an organism's environment. The overall shape of a hair is simple: a long, filamentous object that protrudes from the surface of an organism. This basic design, however, can confer a wide range of functions, owing largely to the flexibility and large surface area that it usually possesses. From this simple structural basis, small changes in geometry, such as diameter, curvature and inter-hair spacing, ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 180 publications
(238 reference statements)
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of arrays of hair‐like structures, such as ctenes, in locomotion depends on how much of the fluid flows through the gaps between the hairs, termed the leakiness of the array, as opposed to flowing around the perimeter of the whole array (Koehl, 2001). At very low Reynolds numbers, Re < 1, each hair in the array is surrounded by a thick boundary layer that extends into the fluid, so when hairs are close, the interacting boundary layers significantly reduce fluid flow between hairs and thus the array behaves like a paddle with a continuous surface (Seale, Cummins, Viola, Mastropaolo, & Nakayama, 2018). In general, as the Reynolds number of the array increases, so too does the leakiness (Koehl, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of arrays of hair‐like structures, such as ctenes, in locomotion depends on how much of the fluid flows through the gaps between the hairs, termed the leakiness of the array, as opposed to flowing around the perimeter of the whole array (Koehl, 2001). At very low Reynolds numbers, Re < 1, each hair in the array is surrounded by a thick boundary layer that extends into the fluid, so when hairs are close, the interacting boundary layers significantly reduce fluid flow between hairs and thus the array behaves like a paddle with a continuous surface (Seale, Cummins, Viola, Mastropaolo, & Nakayama, 2018). In general, as the Reynolds number of the array increases, so too does the leakiness (Koehl, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, µ air = 1.8 × 10 −5 a.s is the dynamic viscosity of air, U air < 1 ms −1 is the radial air-speed out of the narrow gap estimated based on our recent report 47 , Z ≈ 1.5 µm is the representative length of microtrichia, E ≈ 9 GPa is the characteristic Young's modulus for hairs from the work of Seale et al 48 , and…”
Section: Grooming Behavior Grooming Was Commonly Observed In Halobatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By uncovering the physics behind the flight of the dandelion, we have discovered a novel type of fluid behaviour around fluid-immersed bodies. As filamentous microstructures within the relevant regimes (< 1 for the pore scale and about 100 − 1,000 for the body scale) are commonplace in the biological world 19,31,34 , we anticipate that permeability-dependent flow control is prevalent in nature. Traditionally, fluid dynamics investigations tend to observe a single scale; exploration of interplays among multiple regimes may uncover other as yet unknown fluid behaviour.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%