2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-29863-9_29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design Science Research Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
278
0
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 269 publications
(284 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
278
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The first stage utilizes an initial iteration of a design science methodology as defined by Peffers, et. al, [28] to develop and implement the malicious code into an application. Any overprivileged application could have been chosen for this experiment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first stage utilizes an initial iteration of a design science methodology as defined by Peffers, et. al, [28] to develop and implement the malicious code into an application. Any overprivileged application could have been chosen for this experiment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since our goal is to extend human and organizational innovation capabilities by creating a new artifact, this paper follows the design science research (DSR) in information systems (IS) paradigm [25] and builds on the well-established DSR framework by Peffers et al [26]. Hence, it is structured along six generic DSR activities: 1) problem identifycation, 2) objectives of a solution, 3) design & development, 4) demonstration, 5) evaluation, 6) communication.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation of our research output in form of the EABW assessment is important; however despite many suggestions still challenging [28,29]. It is necessary to justify the design and ensure that the intended approach satisfies the stakeholders.…”
Section: Fig 1 Dsr Artifact Build Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such decisions are further classified in [31]. A classification of various evaluation methods based on a limited literature review is presented in [29]. By far the most prominent method is the technical experiment to evaluate the technical performance rather than real world performance.…”
Section: Fig 1 Dsr Artifact Build Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%