1998
DOI: 10.1002/zamm.19980781514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design sensitivity analysis of industrial robot

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the error sources mentioned above, there have two approaches to improve the positioning accuracy (Huang et al , 2002). Manufacturing and assembly errors can be reduced by decreasing their manufacturing and assembly tolerances during the accuracy design phase, which can be achieved by identifying the main error sources (Ciglaric and Oblak, 1998; Li et al , 2018). Alternatively, the accuracy can be improved by compensating the error of the end effector at each point, which includes kinematics modeling, error modeling and error compensation (Gong et al , 2000; Pane et al , 2019; Kumar and Sathiaseelan, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the error sources mentioned above, there have two approaches to improve the positioning accuracy (Huang et al , 2002). Manufacturing and assembly errors can be reduced by decreasing their manufacturing and assembly tolerances during the accuracy design phase, which can be achieved by identifying the main error sources (Ciglaric and Oblak, 1998; Li et al , 2018). Alternatively, the accuracy can be improved by compensating the error of the end effector at each point, which includes kinematics modeling, error modeling and error compensation (Gong et al , 2000; Pane et al , 2019; Kumar and Sathiaseelan, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%