2008 IEEE International SOC Conference 2008
DOI: 10.1109/socc.2008.4641527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design space exploration for application specific FPGAS in system-on-a-chip designs

Abstract: The inclusion of field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) within a system-on-a-chip (SOC) design offers programmability, flexibility, and reconfigurability not possible with application specific integrated circuits (ASIC) or fullcustom implementations. However, these benefits come at the expense of significant area, performance, and power consumption overheads compared to ASIC or full-custom circuits. As a typical SOC design will require fabrication of the final integrated circuit, rather than rely on a generic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Starting with a more traditional approach, Hammerquist et al [13] devised the concept of application-specific FPGAs (AFPGAs) to fill the gap between FPGAs and Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs), which are much more expensive in terms of time and money to develop and implement. The exploration problem is defined as a search among architectural features to be customized.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Starting with a more traditional approach, Hammerquist et al [13] devised the concept of application-specific FPGAs (AFPGAs) to fill the gap between FPGAs and Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs), which are much more expensive in terms of time and money to develop and implement. The exploration problem is defined as a search among architectural features to be customized.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main difference that the reader can notice is in the high number of BRAMs compared to the others. The first solution exploits instruction and data memories size of 2 15 , while the others 2 14 and 2 13 , respectively. We can see how increasing from 2 14 to 2 15 memory sizes yield a sensible…”
Section: Neorv32: Vhdl Risc-v Corementioning
confidence: 99%