2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.08.074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design study of a neutral beam injector for fusion DEMO plant at JAERI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Inoue et al [33] proposed arrays of semiconductor lasers. These have area ∼0.05 × 0.05 mm, and large divergences of 10-35 • .…”
Section: The Lasermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Inoue et al [33] proposed arrays of semiconductor lasers. These have area ∼0.05 × 0.05 mm, and large divergences of 10-35 • .…”
Section: The Lasermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10, which also shows the ITER layout for comparison). It is in any case desirable to structure the beam into several "beam groups", as this allows radiation shielding to be placed inside the beamline [33]. Fig.…”
Section: Layoutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the point of view of system efficiency, NBI should adopt electrostatic acceleration in which around 50% of system efficiency is foreseeable in 2020-2030. Based on this acceleration method, the beam energy of NBI is restricted to be lower than 2 MeV [26] and thus the beam mainly deposits in the peripheral region at standard parameters of SlimCS. In spite of such a peripheral deposition, the electrostatic acceleration is favourable compared with higher energy NBI based on RFQ acceleration in terms of system efficiency.…”
Section: Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our analysis using an ACCOME code [18] on current drive efficiency (η CD ) indicates NBCD has a little advantage over ECCD in that η CD of NBCD is 10-30% larger than that of ECCD when the plasma current is driven in the central region. As to NBCD, although η CD increases up to 3 MeV, the beam energy of 1.5-2 MeV based on electrostatic acceleration is favorable from the viewpoint of the system efficiency compared with higher energy NB based on RFQ acceleration [19]. For the 1.5-2 MeV NBI, the system efficiency of around 50% is foreseen for DEMO.…”
Section: Current Drive Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%