2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.02.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of a novel series of quercetin diacylglucosides as potent anti-MRSA and anti-VRE agents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
20
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Verapamil did not show synergy within assay limits for these strains, due to low concentrations, as this EPI is of lower potency compared with compound 1 and reserpine. 25 In contrast to earlier findings that compound 1 has MIC values of 1-2 mg/L for a selection of clinically isolated MRSA strains, 11,12 we found that compound 1 had MIC values of 25 mg/L for the S. aureus strains used in our study. This might be explained by the use of different strains.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Verapamil did not show synergy within assay limits for these strains, due to low concentrations, as this EPI is of lower potency compared with compound 1 and reserpine. 25 In contrast to earlier findings that compound 1 has MIC values of 1-2 mg/L for a selection of clinically isolated MRSA strains, 11,12 we found that compound 1 had MIC values of 25 mg/L for the S. aureus strains used in our study. This might be explained by the use of different strains.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…9,10 Compound 1 and related isomers have previously been found to have anti-methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) activity. 11,12 The 2,3-coumaroyl isomer of compound 1 has been shown not to cause acute toxicity in mice at 20 mg/kg/day. 13 The NorA inhibitory activity of compound 1 reported in this publication has not been reported previously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As seen in Table 1, compounds 2 and 3 showed null or moderate bacteriostatic activity, with no killing effect on either bacterium. Even though there are precedents in the literature about the antibacterial activity exerted by compound 2 against E. coli and against some methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (Hirai et al 2010;Kuete et al 2011), other authors reported a lack of effectiveness (Hossion et al 2010;Li et al 2009) matching that obtained in this work. The level of activity shown by compound 3 against E. coli and S. aureus, does not match that found by Van Puyvelde et al (1989), but it does agree with the results obtained by Talib et al (2012) in a microtiter plate dilution test performed against E. coli.…”
Section: Determination Of Mics and Mbcscontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…Maybe the fluorine modulates the electronic effects on phenyl rings and also influences the steric characteristics and the hydrophilicÀhydrophobic balance of these molecules. 28 On the other hand, compounds having comparatively high MW and bulky side chains did not inhibit the growth of Gramnegative organisms, even at high concentrations, despite showing pronounced E. coli DNA gyrase supercoiling inhibition. The reason for these results is not clear, but hindrance of penetration into Gram-negative organism through the porin channel might be involved.…”
Section: Journal Of Medicinal Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%