2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2022.117134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of BRD4 degraders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a family of BET PROTAC degraders has been identified, the selectivity issue of BET PROTACs has not been fully addressed. Ding and Nowak designed and synthesized novel small-molecule BRD4 degraders 44 126 and 45 86 by using different linkages to conjugate JQ1 and E3 ligase ligands, respectively ( Fig. 39 ).…”
Section: Bromodomain and Extra-terminal (Bet) Domain-targeting Degradersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a family of BET PROTAC degraders has been identified, the selectivity issue of BET PROTACs has not been fully addressed. Ding and Nowak designed and synthesized novel small-molecule BRD4 degraders 44 126 and 45 86 by using different linkages to conjugate JQ1 and E3 ligase ligands, respectively ( Fig. 39 ).…”
Section: Bromodomain and Extra-terminal (Bet) Domain-targeting Degradersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 133 From SAR studies, it is possible to verify that the incorporation of a phenyl group as a binding vector between the linker and ELM, in the 4‐position, reduced the activity of PROTAC. 133 On the other hand, if the vector is ethylenediamine, it generates a degrader (8b) that inhibits cell proliferation with IC 50 values between 3 and 27 nM, obtained through the induction of BRD4 degradation in a dose‐ and time‐dependent manner. 133 Replacing nitrogen with oxygen in the 4‐position leads to a reduction in PROTAC activity.…”
Section: Protacs Against Leukemia‐associated Targetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 133 On the other hand, if the vector is ethylenediamine, it generates a degrader (8b) that inhibits cell proliferation with IC 50 values between 3 and 27 nM, obtained through the induction of BRD4 degradation in a dose‐ and time‐dependent manner. 133 Replacing nitrogen with oxygen in the 4‐position leads to a reduction in PROTAC activity. 133 …”
Section: Protacs Against Leukemia‐associated Targetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical PROTAC degrader consists of three components: the target‐binding small molecule ligand (protein of interest, POI), the E3 ligase ligand and the appropriate linker that connects the two components (Figure 1). 50,66–73 E3 ligases and the corresponding ligands are important as the driving force of protein degradation 74–91 . Good drug‐like small‐molecule ligands for a E3 ligase system are still limited 92–97 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 50 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 E3 ligases and the corresponding ligands are important as the driving force of protein degradation. 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 Good drug‐like small‐molecule ligands for a E3 ligase system are still limited. 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 Although more than 600 E3 ligases are encoded by human genome, only less than 10 E3 ligases were developed as ligands for the development of PROTAC degraders, including von Hippel‐Lindau (VHL), cereblon (CRBN), mouse double minute 2 (MDM2), cellular IAP1 (cIAP1), Kelch‐like ECH‐associated protein‐1 (KEAP1), DDB1‐cullin 4‐associated factor (DCAF), RING finger protein (RNF), aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR), and others (Figure 1 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%