2021
DOI: 10.3390/ph14060547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design, Synthesis, In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of Heterobivalent SiFAlin-Modified Peptidic Radioligands Targeting Both Integrin αvβ3 and the MC1 Receptor—Suitable for the Specific Visualization of Melanomas?

Abstract: Combining two peptides addressing two different receptors to a heterobivalent peptidic ligand (HBPL) is thought to enable an improved tumor-targeting sensitivity and thus tumor visualization, compared to monovalent peptide ligands. In the case of melanoma, the Melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1R), which is stably overexpressed in the majority of primary malignant melanomas, and integrin αvβ3, which is involved in lymph node metastasis and therefore has an important role in the transition from local to metastatic dis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(94 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this purpose, the peptides were synthesized on solid support (Scheme 1A, B and C) and in the following further modified using a PEG3 linker unit followed by 4-maleimidobutyric acid to obtain peptides analogs amenable to efficient chemoselective functionalization with the MIUs (Scheme 1D). In detail, the three peptides 2 a-c were completely built on solid support using standard Fmoc-based solid phase-assisted synthesis protocols, as reported in previous procedures [27][28][29]. Cyclization of peptides was performed while being still attached to the resin and after removal of the respective protecting groups (Mtt-and O-2-Ph i Pr-PG (2 b) were removed under mildly acidic conditions, and the All-PG (2 c) by treatment with phenylsilane (PhSiH3) and tetrakis(triphenylphosphine) palladium(0) (Pd(PPH3)4)).…”
Section: Synthesis Of the Maleimide-modified Peptide Units 3 A-cmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this purpose, the peptides were synthesized on solid support (Scheme 1A, B and C) and in the following further modified using a PEG3 linker unit followed by 4-maleimidobutyric acid to obtain peptides analogs amenable to efficient chemoselective functionalization with the MIUs (Scheme 1D). In detail, the three peptides 2 a-c were completely built on solid support using standard Fmoc-based solid phase-assisted synthesis protocols, as reported in previous procedures [27][28][29]. Cyclization of peptides was performed while being still attached to the resin and after removal of the respective protecting groups (Mtt-and O-2-Ph i Pr-PG (2 b) were removed under mildly acidic conditions, and the All-PG (2 c) by treatment with phenylsilane (PhSiH3) and tetrakis(triphenylphosphine) palladium(0) (Pd(PPH3)4)).…”
Section: Synthesis Of the Maleimide-modified Peptide Units 3 A-cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same procedure was repeated for the following amino acids. Detailed syntheses of the three peptide units can be found in the corresponding references [27][28][29]. The PEG spacer (4 equiv.)…”
Section: General Synthesis Of Peptidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data show that the internal reference peptides hEGF, c(RGDyK), and c(RGDfK) showed the expected affinity to their respective targets with IC 50 values of 19.3 ± 2.7 nM for hEGF to the EGFR, 630 ± 144 nM for c(RGDyK) and 872 ± 198 nM for c(RGDfK) to integrin α v β 3 , being in the range of published values. 44,45 In comparison, the HBPLs showed an only slightly decreased affinity to integrin α v β 3 , presenting IC 50 values to this receptor type of 1.39 ± 0.12 μM for 1 and 1.48 ± 0.29 μM for 2. In contrast, both heterobivalent agents failed to demonstrate any affinity toward the EGFR up to a concentration of 1 mM.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although many peptide receptor targets are available for exploration today, optimization of peptide ligands that are relevant to a disease state requires further investigation. Alternative strategies such as multi‐receptor targeting by utilizing combinations of peptides and heterodimer (hybrid) peptides labelled with various radionuclides can be employed to advance selectivity, stability, binding affinity, and related imaging quality (Cheng et al, 2021; Judmann et al, 2020; Liu et al, 2009).…”
Section: Peptide Based Probes For Molecular Imaging and Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%