2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2022.133312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design, synthesis, in vitro anticancer and antimicrobial evaluation, SAR analysis, molecular docking and dynamic simulation of new pyrazoles, triazoles and pyridazines based isoxazole

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Molecular dynamics (MD) studies were carried out utilizing an NVIDIA Quadro 6000 graphics processing unit and the Desmond MD simulation software for the docking poses of CA4 in the hMAO-B enzyme with the lowest negative score, i.e., top-docking poses. As earlier studies, more information for MD investigations such as thermostat and barometer settings, box type, short- and long-range interaction calculations was considered because the same settings were applied for the analyzed systems here, i.e., 100 ns of MD generation was done, with coordinates stored at 100 ps to produce trajectories of 1000 frames each for investigating the dynamics of protein–ligand interactions. Finally, the simulated interaction diagram tool was used for stability analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Molecular dynamics (MD) studies were carried out utilizing an NVIDIA Quadro 6000 graphics processing unit and the Desmond MD simulation software for the docking poses of CA4 in the hMAO-B enzyme with the lowest negative score, i.e., top-docking poses. As earlier studies, more information for MD investigations such as thermostat and barometer settings, box type, short- and long-range interaction calculations was considered because the same settings were applied for the analyzed systems here, i.e., 100 ns of MD generation was done, with coordinates stored at 100 ps to produce trajectories of 1000 frames each for investigating the dynamics of protein–ligand interactions. Finally, the simulated interaction diagram tool was used for stability analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 41 44 As earlier studies, more information for MD investigations such as thermostat and barometer settings, box type, short- and long-range interaction calculations was considered because the same settings were applied for the analyzed systems here, i.e., 100 ns of MD generation was done, with coordinates stored at 100 ps to produce trajectories of 1000 frames each for investigating the dynamics of protein–ligand interactions. 45 49 Finally, the simulated interaction diagram tool was used for stability analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constructed system was then subjected to energy minimization using preset OPLS3e force field parameters to accurately align the protein structure within the simulation constraints and to minimize electronic conflicts between protein structures [ 41 , 42 ]. The energy-minimized system was then put through a 50 ns MD simulation with an “isothermal-isobaric ensemble” (NPT) employing a 1 bar using Martyna–Tobias–Klein barostats and a Nose–Hoover thermostat at 300 K [ 43 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the essential metrics that describes fluctuations in structural conformation of the protein backbone over time during system equilibration is the RMSD value acquired from the MD simulation trajectory, and low and consistent RMSD values show the protein structure's stability. To analyze the ligand-protein interaction, the protein should approach equilibrium, that is, the RMSD value should remain steady [80][81][82] . Figure 6 shows the RMSD computed for the two complexes based on the protein backbone using the Simulation interaction diagram tool.…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%