2018
DOI: 10.1080/10476210.2018.1531841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design thinking and the practicing teacher: addressing problems of practice in teacher education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Behaviour design thinking integrates cutting-edge behavioural science with design thinking to drive innovation at the product, service, and experience levels, leading to success and business growth across industries [9]. Thus, design thinking is also considered a promising educational approach to dealing with complex, diverse, and often difficult problems that teachers and educators face in professional practice, ranging across teaching and learning topics, to social or community issues, classroom climate issues, and countless others [10][11][12]. Moreover, Henriksen et al [12] suggest that design thinking may provide an accessible structure for teachers and educators to think creatively when coping with educational problems of practice, and may support and augment traditional critical thinking as argued by Ericson [2] and Kijima et al [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behaviour design thinking integrates cutting-edge behavioural science with design thinking to drive innovation at the product, service, and experience levels, leading to success and business growth across industries [9]. Thus, design thinking is also considered a promising educational approach to dealing with complex, diverse, and often difficult problems that teachers and educators face in professional practice, ranging across teaching and learning topics, to social or community issues, classroom climate issues, and countless others [10][11][12]. Moreover, Henriksen et al [12] suggest that design thinking may provide an accessible structure for teachers and educators to think creatively when coping with educational problems of practice, and may support and augment traditional critical thinking as argued by Ericson [2] and Kijima et al [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of knowledge was pioneered and popularized by Lee Shulman (1986) and later Wilson, Shulman & Richert, (1987) that it is knowledge which includes what makes learning of specific topics easy or difficult (Shulman, 1986(Shulman, , 1987. A topic which is addressed in this paper is the design process and its importance is that the design process offers a framework for etutors to engage with problems of practice where they view themselves as knowledge experts who empower with their abilities to address problems at a time in which challenges abound during the teaching of the design process (Henriksen, Gretter & Richardson, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…At the same time, according to Design and Technology framework Institute of Design at Stanford (2016), the steps of the Design and Technology framework are suggested as: empathize, define, ideate, prototype and test. While the Stanford model has five phases of design thinking, referred to as modes, which are worked through toward a problem solution or resolution (Henriksen et al 2020). Also, the Department of Basic Education (2011) in the South African schools' curriculum in its Curriculum Assessment Policy Statement recommends procedural steps of investigate, design, make, evaluate, and communicate (IDMEC).…”
Section: Research Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tale aspetto può essere ricondotto all'utilizzo, durante la ricerca collaborativa, di tecniche e strumenti che hanno supportato il lavoro collegiale e l'apertura a possibilità di cambiamento creativo dei modi di pensare e di lavorare, per affrontare problemi complessi di ordine pratico che gli insegnati incontrano nel loro operare quotidiano, su fronti diversi ed attraverso contesti variegati (Henriksen, et al 2018).…”
Section: La Valorizzazione Delle Relazioni Inter-ed Infra-organizzativeunclassified