Design Thinking Process Model Review

Waidelich, Lukas; Richter, Alexander; Kölmel, Bernhard; Bulander, Rebecca

doi:10.1109/ice.2018.8436281

Cited by 29 publications

(32 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Search for data sources through google scholar, Hindawi, Sciencedirect, Eric, Taylor of Francis and ProQuest. Müller, 2011;Jobst et al, 2011;Waidelich et al, 2018;Kwon et al, 2021) dan dikuti oleh IDEO ( 25 % n= 3) (Auernhammer & Roth, 2021;Davis, 2010;Wrigley et al, 2018). In addition, the DSchool Design Thinking model is able to provide such benefits to the teaching and learning process (Melles et al, 2011).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Systematic Literature Review: TPACK-Integrated Design Thinking in Education

Abdul Rahman,

Tomi Apra Santosa,

Aulia Sofianora

et al. 2023

IJEL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research aims to analyze design thinking integrated with technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in ducation. This research is a type of systematic literature review (SLR) research with the PRISMA method. The data sources in the study came from 10 national and international journals published between 2018- 2023 and indexed by SINTA, Scopus, and WOS. The search for data sources comes from Google Scholar, MPDI, ScienceDirect, Wiley, and Eric. The analysis shows that 1) TPACK-integrated design thinking has a positive impact on the learning process, and 2) design thinking integrated with TPACK in education has a variety of forms both in theory and practice. Based on these findings, it can be concluded that the concept of design thinking integrated with TPACK is very necessary to be developed in the education system in Indonesia. Design thinking integrated with TPACK is able to encourage students' critical thinking skills and creativity in learning.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Systematic Literature Review: TPACK-Integrated Design Thinking in Education

Abdul Rahman,

Tomi Apra Santosa,

Aulia Sofianora

et al. 2023

IJEL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, the influence of user research depends on its visibility and credibility to decision makers. Similarly, DT is an approach aimed to address innovation processes, and, given its capability to respond to the complexity of the current business scenario (Waidelich et al, 2018), the interest on this concept is growing. Substantially, DT tends to break the rules to rewrite new ones (Brenner & Uebernickel, 2016).…”

Section: The Need For Industry and Society 50 Approaches To Decisionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Smart Environments and Techno-centric and Human-Centric Innovations for Industry and Society 5.0: A Quintuple Helix Innovation System View Towards Smart, Sustainable, and Inclusive Solutions

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper investigates the aviation sector, as a case in point for a Smart environment and as an example for Industry 5.0 and Society 5.0 purposes. In the smart complex environments, a systemic vision of the elements, which act and are acted within a given territory, should be the basis of a hypothesis of joint growth. Indeed, the synergies activated by the system can be seen as the product of the application of a particular knowledge-based open innovation strategy, as an orientation capable of transforming theoretical assumptions into concrete operational innovation paths. Through the evidence emerged from an important case study and the application of an MCDA methodology, we have tried to identify which are the optimal solutions for the implementation of the new human-centric logics of I5.0, analyzing them on the basis of the actual benefits for the ecosystem, going beyond the self-referential aptitude of the firm to instill technological changes and managerial visions. Knowledge circulation, dialogue between sub-systems, and the ability to adapt technology and entrepreneurial strategies to the environment in which it operates (with the users as first stakeholders) seem to be necessary practices in knowledge-based innovation, prioritization, and decision-making processes, for smart, sustainable, and inclusive solutions.

show abstract

“…We have a number of approaches to design work -from "Double Diamond" (Banathy, 1996) as "social systems design," the "Design Thinking" process as a tool for solving "wicked problems" (Buchanan, 1992), through modifications of the example "Sprint" (Knapp et al, 2016) (now it's "Sprint 2.0"), to "Design Driven Innovation" (Verganti, 2009) as a methodology for creating new markets. A valuable overview of Design Thinking process models can be found in (Waidelich et al, 2018). All approaches are based on group work and an assumed iterative structure of activities.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

2022

SPSUTOM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of the study is to indicate the essence of copyright in the context of what was, is, and may be. Drawing attention to the changing reality, the expansion of artificial intelligence as a potential author of a given work, who as the creator will be entitled to legal protection. If we assume that a snail and cancer can be a fish, a carrot can be a fruit, and a machine cannot be an inventor because it is just a tool, then what is copyright in human life? What is the difference between artificial intelligence in copyright law and the natural intelligence of a given author -creator, if both are intelligent creations? Why is there talk of a higher than natural intelligence in a situation in which it is not so much about something completely new and from the beginning, but about something that is simply better, faster, more accurate and more efficient in some respects than an intelligent man, whom this thing does not replace, but only helps. Design/methodology/approach: The research method used in this article is the analysis of legal sources, scientific studies of interdisciplinary scope, supplemented by interviews, observations and experience of the author. The research procedure included the analysis of information sources, a review of Polish and foreign literature, an analysis of legal acts, a method of analysis and synthesis, a case study and logical deductive reasoning in the timespace of yesterdaytodaytomorrow. Findings: For centuries, man has wanted to be better, to overcome basically everything, including Nature, to create something that could have existed so far without his participation or with his indirect participation. The emergence of concepts related to artificial intelligence only seemingly suggests a desire to take control of man. Man is a realistic, rich structure composed of soul and body, which artificial intelligence does not have. Who will be the creator and who will be entitled to the rights and how they will be protected when the object of protection becomes the product of artificial intelligence. Thanks to the algorithms used, an artificial intellectual creator is able to quickly assimilate many things, but first he must know what.Here we come to a very important issuewho should "feed" artificial intelligence data so that the so-called biased algorithms are not created. At the moment, attributing copyright to machines and devices and granting them legal protection as a creator seems to be an action incompatible with the natural protection of man as a creator.Research limitations/implications: The limitations of the results obtained may result from a limited research sample, including textual sample. They may result from too innovative invention of comprehensive use of artificial intelligence, which in the case of copyright is attributed to man. The trick is to come up with an innovative solution and construct some 8 M. Boczek unprecedented thing, but the success of this mainly depends on their widespread use. In many areas, artificial intelligence is to be used on the march, it will be m...

show abstract

Design Thinking Process Model Review

Cited by 29 publications

References 22 publications

Systematic Literature Review: TPACK-Integrated Design Thinking in Education

Systematic Literature Review: TPACK-Integrated Design Thinking in Education

Smart Environments and Techno-centric and Human-Centric Innovations for Industry and Society 5.0: A Quintuple Helix Innovation System View Towards Smart, Sustainable, and Inclusive Solutions

Untitled

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About