2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12528-017-9165-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design tools in practice: instructional designers report which tools they use and why

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, instructors should be cautious about the scope of possible instruments presented to learners. As indicated by Lachheb and Boling (2018), it would be beneficial to teach students how to select the needed tools, resources, and materials, rather than which instruments should be used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, instructors should be cautious about the scope of possible instruments presented to learners. As indicated by Lachheb and Boling (2018), it would be beneficial to teach students how to select the needed tools, resources, and materials, rather than which instruments should be used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, solutions to such problems require an extensive skill set, including tacit knowledge, the ability to communicate and collaborate effectively, and the ability to make good design judgments (Lachheb & Boing, 2018;Lachheb & Boling, 2021). Research has shown that, in preparing of future IDers, formal education and training should place a greater emphasis on realities that IDers tackle in situ (Abramenka- Lachheb et al, 2021b;Lachheb & Boling, 2018;Stefaniak et al, 2020;Tracey & Boling, 2014;Yanchar et al, 2010). Foundational research on the topic, such as Rowland (1992) and Rowland et al (1992), suggested that adequate formal education should help future IDers gain skills that are aligned with what IDers do in real-life professional settings.…”
Section: Community Of Practice To Support Skill Development For Instructional Designersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The operational framework they described entailed a six-step process and a support toolkit outlined by Abramenka- Lachheb et al (2021a), which helped them effectively support faculty to transition from face-to-face to ERT. Such process and support toolkits were invented on the spot and were not described in instructional technology and instructional design textbooks, which speaks to the ability of the authors to make solid design judgments and create internal design tools when needed to support their professional practice (Lachheb & Boling, 2018). In a recently published textbook chapter, stated that the rapid pivot to ERT due to the COVID-19 pandemic is "likely to diminish faculty satisfaction with online teaching" (p. 48).…”
Section: Instructional Designers' Work For Emergency Remote Instruction (Ert)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are tremendous efforts to model a variety of instructional designs in the space of educational technologies (Bohl, Scheuhase, Sengler, & Winand, 2002;Neven & Duval, 2002;Rodríguez-Artacho & Maillo, 2004;Koper, 2005;Sicilia, Lytras, Sánchez-Alonso, García-Barriocanal, & Zapata-Ros, 2011;Burgos, 2015;Piskurich, 2015;Larson & Lockee, 2019), platforms and tools (Botturi et al, 2008;Lachheb & Boling, 2018). However, despite significant progress, most of the promises in educational technologies seem to be unfulfilled (Toyama, 2011;Hernández-Leo, Asensio-Pérez, Derntl, Prieto, & Chacón, 2014;Cuban & Jandrić, 2015;Selwyn, 2020).…”
Section: Idont Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%