Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3173574.3173848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design Vocabulary for Human--IoT Systems Communication

Abstract: DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To understand possible communications that will be needed between human and intelligent systems, in a previous study [10], we chose and analyze nine concept videos produced by leading companies, research institutes, and independent designers. Through the semantic analysis of the interactions between the user and a system of smart things demonstrated in the films, we extracted 43 design vocabularies and clustered them into 11 categories.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand possible communications that will be needed between human and intelligent systems, in a previous study [10], we chose and analyze nine concept videos produced by leading companies, research institutes, and independent designers. Through the semantic analysis of the interactions between the user and a system of smart things demonstrated in the films, we extracted 43 design vocabularies and clustered them into 11 categories.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Despouys et al [40] have proposed a model for 'sensemaking' within the context of smart homes, in order to identify and manage potential scenarios where the expectations of users and autonomous systems are misaligned [40]. Similarly, Chuang et al [41] analysed 'concept videos' of IoT products to develop a design vocabulary for human-IoT systems [41], as a means for supporting developers in better communicating and explaining the intended purpose of their IoT systems, such that their users might have a stronger understanding of how they operate. Some have explored the potential of methods for 'explainable AI' within smart home contexts, given that consumer IoT systems will often employ some form of machine learning [42], [43].…”
Section: A Specific User Concernsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to provide users with an understanding of how the system is "interpreting the state of the world". Researchers have provided several frameworks for intelligibility [4,5,17,37], investigated intelligibility issues in commercial products and concepts [17,73], and demonstrated possible ways to provide intelligibility such as graphical interfaces [21,34,67], explanations [33,36,37,68] or shape-change [54]. Despite the beneft of increased transparency, intelligibility can also be harmful if a system behaves appropriately yet shows high uncertainty [35].…”
Section: Related Work 21 Intelligibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%