However, its properties of odorless, colorless, high flammable, wide explosive range (4-75 Vol.%), and low spark ignition energy (0.02 mJ) also arise critical safety concerns due to potential explosion risks. [3] Safety protocol implementation and real-time monitoring are essential for its application. Sensitive, accurate, and fast leakage detection, especially for detecting hydrogen below the explosive limit (<4%), is critical.Various hydrogen sensing strategies have been proposed, including microelectromechanical, [4] catalytic, [5] thermal, [6] electrochemical, [7] mechanical, [8] optical, [9] and acoustic [10] detection schemes. The core element for all these sensing systems is the hydrogen sensitive materials, such as metal oxides (In 2 O 3 , [11] ZnO, [12] TiO 2 , [13] and W 18 O 49 [14] ) and hydride-forming metals (Pd, [15] Mg, [16] Y, [17] alloys [18] ). Among various sensing materials, metal oxides are less applicable because they require a high working temperature of over 400 °C to maintain optimal sensitivity. Therefore, hydride-forming metals, which can work at room temperature with high sensitivity and selectivity, have been commonly used in optical hydrogen sensors. In particular, Pd has been widely used in many works because of its fully reversible hydride formation properties under ambient conditions. When Pd is exposed to hydrogen gas, hydrogen Optical nanosensors are promising for hydrogen sensing because they are small, free from spark generation, and feasible for remote optical readout. Conventional optical nanosensors require broadband excitation and spectrometers, rendering the devices bulky and complex. An alternative is spatial intensity-based optical sensing, which only requires an imaging system and a smartly designed platform to report the spatial distribution of analytical optical signals.