Designed curriculum and local culture: Acknowledging the primacy of classroom culture

Abstract

ABSTRACT:One of the primary challenges facing designers today is how to design curricular innovations that are appealing and useful to teachers and at the same time bring about transformative practices. While we as a learning sciences community are relatively adept at facilitating innovative case examples, we need more empirical work that examines how curricular innovations become implemented across multiple classrooms. In this paper we examine a series of four teachers implementing our technology-rich, project-based curriculum. We then analyze and discuss each of the four cases across two themes by (a) examining how the project-level question was contextualized to meet local needs and (b) examining the cultural context that surrounded the implementation of the curriculum. Our interpretations suggest that contextualizing the curriculum is ultimately a local phenomenon that arises as a result of a number of factors, including students' needs, students' goals, teachers' goals, local constraints, and teacher's pedagogical values. These cases illuminate the importance of school and classroom cultures in the learning process. Ultimately, curriculum designers need to acknowledge that their designs are not self-sufficient entities; instead, during implementation, they become assimilated as part of the cultural systems in which they are

Mad City Mystery: Developing Scientific Argumentation Skills with a Place-based Augmented Reality Game on Handheld Computers

“…Within most classrooms, rather than inquiry, the dominating activity system of schooling, with its emphasis on order, control, grades, and hierarchy, characterizes the activities of students and teachers (cf. Squire et al, 2003b).…”

The development of preservice elementary teachers' curricular role identity for science teaching

“…To better support beginning and experienced teachers' learning, it is crucial for curriculum developers to design science curriculum materials that support their science-teaching practice by making them flexibly adaptive Fishman & Krajcik, 2003;Schwartz, Lin, Brophy, & Bransford, 1999;Squire, MaKinster, Barnett, Luehmann, & Barab, 2003), or conducive to local adaptation. Embedding features that are explicitly educative for teachers who use the curriculum materials (Ball & Cohen, 1996;Davis & Krajcik, 2005) will help these materials speak to teachers rather than through them (Remillard, 2000), thus making the teacher -curriculum relationship more productive.…”

Preservice elementary teachers' critique of instructional materials for science

“…Pragmatically, teachers often need to adapt even high-quality curriculum materials to better support their own students' learning Baumgartner, 2004;Squire et al, 2003). This adaptation, at both the planning and enactment stages of teaching, is especially important when one takes as a goal the promotion of current educational reforms that recommend engaging students in meaningful learning activities and helping them connect ideas to their real-world experiences.…”