technologies that can outperform Li-ion in at least one index of performance. The lithium-sulfur battery (Li-S) is at the forefront of competing battery technologies that on account of being potentially lighter weight, could find immediate use in emerging applications in aviation, provided that solutions to the low cycle-life and poor power delivery can be devised.Extensive research over the past ten years has yielded marked improvements in our control over this complex battery chemistry, as well as a profound understanding of its failure mechanisms, to the extent that commercialization is now much closer to reality.The fact that the Li-S battery could be commercially realized is now pushing the scientific community to devise more practical approaches for implementing what is proving to be a far-from-straightforward technology. The latter feature is no more apparent than in the development of the sulfur cathode, where the competing themes of high sulfur loading, high rate performance, and the irreversible loss of sulfur's reduction products from the cathode have driven much of the research effort to date. Until recently, then, the cathode literature has been dominated by approaches that, while undoubtedly scientifically clever, also involve exotic materials and/or synthetic pathways, thereby rendering the results industrially impractical. Now, in a series of different perspectives, Kaskel and co-workers, [1] Manthiram and co-workers, [2] and Zhang and coworkers [3] have shown the academic community that if they want to be part of the development process of this revolutionary technology, rapid transfer of lab-scale concepts on the prototype cell level is essential. Manthiram and co-workers have simplified the targets of a practical prototype pouch cell and expressed them as the "five 5 s:" sulfur loading >5 mg cm −2 ; carbon content <5%; E/S ratio <5 mL mg −1 ; E/C ratio <5 mL (mA h) −1 ; and negative/ positive (N/P) ratio <5. The successful implementation of all these considerations should, according to Manthiram and co-workers, dramatically transform how lithium-sulfur battery technology is viewed, bridging the gap between academia and industry. [2] Here, however, it seems that feasibility meets the underlying complexity of the Li-S system-often an attempt to fix a deficit in one aspect sees a compromise arising in another. Clearly then, it seemsThe lithium-sulfur (Li-S) battery is at the forefront of technologies that can outperform lithium-ion in at least one index of performance, provided that solutions to poor cycle-life can be devised. One key component of the Li-S battery is the separator, because it holds tremendous promise for improving cycle-life by mitigating the well-known polysulfide shuttle, enabling lean electrolyte configurations, and restricting solid electrolyte interphase growth at the Li-metal anode. However, in response to the advent of the "functional separator" for Li-S batteries, severe misinterpretations of progress have been made due to the often incomplete presentation of the performanc...