Designing a quality scorecard (QSC) for system integration in the era of Industry 4.0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate the criteria to measure and manage a software project’s quality indicator elements needed to implement system integration in the Industry 4.0 era. Design/methodology/approach The standard software process model SPICE: a crucial part of the system integration software development process, is analyzed to explore how the factors of the SPICE model rate qualitatively on the quality scorecard (QSC). QSC is a qualitative performance measurement model based on the cost of quality (COQ) perspective. The SPICE model’s effectiveness is examined in terms of system integration (SI) quality, and factors for improving this quality are determined. Findings The authors proposed future directions for improving SI management. The seven SPICE process groups were analyzed comparatively by matching them to the QSC. The SPICE model was found to achieve 63% with the required factors in QSC. Also, the uncommitted items indicated need to be considered for additional management in SI quality. Practical implications Since SPICE is revised every five years, it is suggested from this study that diagnosing the assessment items from the COQ perspective using QSC is one strategy to quickly enhance the quality of SI management in this rapidly changing technology revolution. Originality/value This research is the first study of its kind, proposing a methodology for adapting quickly to the Fourth Industrial Revolution’s changes and showing how the standards have changed the SPICE model over time.

The Effect of Total Quality Management in Improving Supply Chain Performance

“…quality methods and concepts to improve productivity and performance (Kelly, 2013;Roh et al, 2022). Communication and feedback represent the aspect responsible for measuring the extent to which stakeholders appreciate the company's quality efforts, and thus provide incentives to contribute to achieving quality objectives.…”

Quality Cost Flows in Manufacturing Companies

“…This model is based on the assumption that noncompliance with customer requirements always causes producers considerable economic losses [23]. The uniqueness of this model is that it only records nonproductive losses and thus neglects efficiently spent resources [24]. It monitors the cost in these four categories: cost of internal defects, cost of external defects, the cost associated with investment and the use of opportunities and costs associated with environmental damage.…”