2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2019.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing a realistic ICT closed loop supply chain network with integrated decisions under uncertain demand and lead time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These encompassed mathematical models (Wang Han et al, 2019), game theory (Shekarian et al, 2021), stochastic methods (Baptista et al, 2018), MILP (Mixed-Integer Linear Programming) in conjunction with other techniques (Cardoso et al, 2016;Biçe & Batun, 2021;Jindal & Sangwan, 2014), as well as MINLP (Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Programming) combined with other procedures (Polo et al, 2019). Furthermore, in subsequent developments, heuristic approaches and metaheuristic algorithms are utilized for CLSC/RL/RSC risk management, aiming to achieve near-optimal results (Vahdani & Ahmadzadeh, 2019). Gooran et al (2018) proposed a GA (Genetic Algorithm) approach along with Monte Carlo simulation, while Asl-Najafi et al (2015) designed a method that addresses inventory risk by combining MOPSO (Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization) with the Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA).…”
Section: Methods and Approaches For Rsc Risk Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These encompassed mathematical models (Wang Han et al, 2019), game theory (Shekarian et al, 2021), stochastic methods (Baptista et al, 2018), MILP (Mixed-Integer Linear Programming) in conjunction with other techniques (Cardoso et al, 2016;Biçe & Batun, 2021;Jindal & Sangwan, 2014), as well as MINLP (Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Programming) combined with other procedures (Polo et al, 2019). Furthermore, in subsequent developments, heuristic approaches and metaheuristic algorithms are utilized for CLSC/RL/RSC risk management, aiming to achieve near-optimal results (Vahdani & Ahmadzadeh, 2019). Gooran et al (2018) proposed a GA (Genetic Algorithm) approach along with Monte Carlo simulation, while Asl-Najafi et al (2015) designed a method that addresses inventory risk by combining MOPSO (Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization) with the Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA).…”
Section: Methods and Approaches For Rsc Risk Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These approaches are limited in their ability to adapt to changes over multiple periods. Metaheuristic approaches such as GA (Genetic Algorithm), NSGA II (Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II), and MOPSO (Multi-objective Particle Swarm Optimization) is used to design optimization models for RSC risk management while considering uncertainty (Jabbarzadeh et al, 2018;Vahdani & Ahmadzadeh, 2019). This research aims to develop a comprehensive optimization model for RSC management, considering multi-purpose and multi-period aspects, as well as supply and demand uncertainties and reservations associated with the quantity and quality of returned goods.…”
Section: Figure 1 Keyword Reference Network Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach can prevent a distinct impact on economic performance via changes in quality. In [35], a mixed-integer nonlinear programming (MILP) model was proposed to integrate pricing with facility location and inventory control decisions in a CLSCN in the information and communications technology (ICT) industry. This model maximizes the total profit obtained by selling the new ICT products or collecting the used ICT products.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the uncertain behavior of demand and lead time leads to a failure to satisfy customers’ needs. Previous studies have separately discussed the parameters of demand probability and lead-time probability without establishing and extracting the parameters of the demand-during-lead-time probability distribution, such as the mean of demand during lead time μ L and the standard deviation of demand during lead time σ L (Axsäter and Viswanathan, 2012; Braglia et al , 2019; Sayid Albana et al , 2018; Vahdani and Ahmadzadeh, 2019).…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%