1998
DOI: 10.1108/09596119810222096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing a seamless hotel organization

Abstract: As hospitality customers become more seasoned, well‐travelled and quality conscious, a hotel’s organizational structure must facilitate the implementation of strategies designed to provide higher levels of service quality. This article discusses the weaknesses of the current organizational structure of hotels and presents a framework for the development of a seamless hotel organization. This modified structure is more favorable to the creation of an environment where customer service quality is the organizatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
18
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, many companies now take a much more strategic approach to the design and operation of systems to find the most efficient ways to manage in global markets (Lawlor and Jayawardena, 2003). All systems can work together (Chacko, 1998) to optimize both the guest service experience and profitability, and hence companies can be more effective in formulating and achieving their strategic objectives (Kim and Oh, 2004). However, hotels are somewhat resistant to change (Okumus and Hemmington, 1998) and so the move towards more off-site systems has not progressed as rapidly as it has in some other industries (Andersen, 2001).…”
Section: Centralization For Chain Hotelsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Hence, many companies now take a much more strategic approach to the design and operation of systems to find the most efficient ways to manage in global markets (Lawlor and Jayawardena, 2003). All systems can work together (Chacko, 1998) to optimize both the guest service experience and profitability, and hence companies can be more effective in formulating and achieving their strategic objectives (Kim and Oh, 2004). However, hotels are somewhat resistant to change (Okumus and Hemmington, 1998) and so the move towards more off-site systems has not progressed as rapidly as it has in some other industries (Andersen, 2001).…”
Section: Centralization For Chain Hotelsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This type of organizational structure is especially objectionable to Generation Y (Barron, Maxwell, Broadbridge, & Ogden, 2007). Chacko (1998) presented the seamless hotel organization structure and characterized the design as circular, flat, and dynamic. The design was circular so that all boundaries of the hotel, where employees serve customers, were equally accessible; flat, to reduce the number of hierarchical levels within the hotel; and dynamic, to create the flexibility to serve the changing needs of guests.…”
Section: Organizational Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nebel (1994) likened a hotel's structure to a tradi tional functional organization with its departments built narrowly akin to watertight cylinders. Chacko (1998) compared hotel organizational structure to a functional pyramid that needs surgery to facilitate greater coordination between departments and enhance flexibility in the operation. An Arthur Andersen forum of CEOs in the hospitality industry addressed the need for hotels to be flat, flexible, and empowered to achieve success (Cline, 1998).…”
Section: Erps and Hotel Organizational Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This will enable the hotel organization to better understand and adapt to customer needs. Simply put, it is the hotel's flexibility that will be tested as the needs of the environment change, and, as a means to gain flexibility, changes to hotel organizational structure are being made by companies such as Marriott and Radisson (Nebel, 1994;Chacko, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%