2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00274.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing and Analyzing Randomized Experiments: Application to a Japanese Election Survey Experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prompt was identical in all surveys, except for a short phrase qualifying President Yayi with one key background characteristic. This phrase was randomly assigned, following a block-randomization design (Horiuchi et al, 2007;Imai et al, 2008). A natural blocking category in estimating the effects of ethnic cueing on respondent support in Benin is ethnicity itself.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prompt was identical in all surveys, except for a short phrase qualifying President Yayi with one key background characteristic. This phrase was randomly assigned, following a block-randomization design (Horiuchi et al, 2007;Imai et al, 2008). A natural blocking category in estimating the effects of ethnic cueing on respondent support in Benin is ethnicity itself.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Throughout the remainder of this article, we assume the absence of missing data as well as perfect compliance with treatment assignment. The violation of these assumptions typically leads to more complications in identification and estimation of causal mechanisms (see, Horiuchi, Imai, and Taniguchi 2007).…”
Section: Potential Outcomes Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 The main advantage of using mail is that it allowed us to expand the sample to all of Norway's 428 municipalities instead of just a small subset of municipalities. The disadvantage is that this creates two well-known problems in conducting survey experiments: nonresponse and noncompliance (Horiuchi et al, 2007). Some may choose not to respond or not to answer all the questions asked, and others may not follow instructions and thereby contaminate the treatment.…”
Section: Samplingmentioning
confidence: 96%