2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing and evaluating a specific teaching intervention on chemical changes based on the notion of argumentation in science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, many studies surveying the impact of scientific discussion on developing students' conceptual understanding have been done. In the studies done by Eryılmaz (2002), Gümrah and Kabapınar (2010), Yeh and She (2010), Niaz, Aguilera, Maza and Liendo (2002), Aslan (2010), Demirci (2008), Yeşiloğlu (2007), Eşkin and Bekiroğlu (2008) it was determined that students overcome their misconceptions, increase their understanding of the concepts, and they constructed the concepts meaningfully and correctly as a result of argumentation-based science teaching. The results of these studies showed that conceptual understanding is realized when students have provided with several possibilities, listening their answers, choosing appropriate answers, and reflecting on the idea, counter idea, resistance and contradictions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, many studies surveying the impact of scientific discussion on developing students' conceptual understanding have been done. In the studies done by Eryılmaz (2002), Gümrah and Kabapınar (2010), Yeh and She (2010), Niaz, Aguilera, Maza and Liendo (2002), Aslan (2010), Demirci (2008), Yeşiloğlu (2007), Eşkin and Bekiroğlu (2008) it was determined that students overcome their misconceptions, increase their understanding of the concepts, and they constructed the concepts meaningfully and correctly as a result of argumentation-based science teaching. The results of these studies showed that conceptual understanding is realized when students have provided with several possibilities, listening their answers, choosing appropriate answers, and reflecting on the idea, counter idea, resistance and contradictions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Argümantasyona dayalı öğrenme ile ilgili uluslararası alanda 1990'lı yıllardan beri çalışılmasına rağmen (Lemke, 1990;Kuhn, 1991Kuhn, , 1993Siegel, 1995) ülkemizde bu alandaki ilk çalışmanın Kaya (2005) tarafından 2005 yılında yapıldığı ve yine ülkemizde yürütülen argümantasyona dayalı çalışmaların çoğunun eğitim teknolojilerini aktif olarak kullanmaksızın gerçekleştirildiği (Günel, Kıngır ve Geban, 2012;Kıngır, Geban ve Günel, 2011;Günel, Akkuş ve Özer Keskin, 2010;Gümrah ve Kabapınar, 2010;Kaya ve Kılıç, 2008;Erduran, Ardaç ve Yakmacı Güzel, 2006) görülmektedir. Teknoloji ile zenginleştirilmiş öğrenme ortamlarının tüm Dünya'da sık ve yaygın bir şekilde kullanıldığı günümüzde öğretim yöntemlerinin zaman ve mekândan bağımsız hale getirilmesi, bilgi ve teknoloji üretiminde başat role sahip olabilmede önem kazanmaktadır.…”
Section: Fen Bilimleri öğRetimi Ve Argümantasyonunclassified
“…Argumentation based learning environments were used to eliminate the misconceptions of the prospective teachers in this study. When the literature is examined, it is seen that argumentation-based learning environments have positive effects on students' conceptual understanding (Asterhan and Schwarz 2009;Dawson and Venville, 2010;Aydeniz, Çetin, Kaya and Pabuçcu, 2012;Aydeniz and Doğan, 2016;Buber and Coban, 2017;Celep, 2015;Choi, Hand and Nam, 2011;Cin and Turkoguz, 2013;Dawson and Venville, 2010;Demirel, 2016;Doruk, Duran and Kaplan, 2017;Gumrah and Kabapınar, 2010;Kaya, 2013;. Kabatas-Memis (2017) conducted a study in order to reveal the tendency in argumentation-based studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%