2011
DOI: 10.1177/104515951102200202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing and Fostering Effective Online Group Projects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers and educators have found that group work projects result in a) the enhancement of student learning through constructive educative processes, b) the development of students' critical thinking and problem solving abilities, and c) an interdependence among group members that facilitates learning of collaborative work skills (Alden 2011; Cameron et al 2009;Isaac 2012;Jensen et al 2012;Payne et al 2006;Rafferty 2013;Scherling 2011). However, participation in group-work can include both negative cognitive and affective consequences for students (Isaac 2012;Neu 2012;Yamane 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Researchers and educators have found that group work projects result in a) the enhancement of student learning through constructive educative processes, b) the development of students' critical thinking and problem solving abilities, and c) an interdependence among group members that facilitates learning of collaborative work skills (Alden 2011; Cameron et al 2009;Isaac 2012;Jensen et al 2012;Payne et al 2006;Rafferty 2013;Scherling 2011). However, participation in group-work can include both negative cognitive and affective consequences for students (Isaac 2012;Neu 2012;Yamane 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…First, students frequently lack the skills to manage a collaborative learning process and may not value the social aspects of group work Morgan et al 2009). Subsequently group work can cause anxiety amongst students because of a) interpersonal conflicts with other students, b) ineffective communications, and c) disparate levels of participation among group members (Dommeyer 2012;Isaac 2012;Scherling 2011;Thompson and Ku 2006). Secondly, grading policies are often viewed as unfair by students (Rafferty 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The work that was turned in by groups often failed to meet the intended outcomes of those assignments, and students would comment on the sub-standard nature of their work, citing the difficulties caused by the dynamics of group projects. Again, this is after repeated attempts to improve the group assignments based on research and best practices (as presented in Scherling [2011] and Stavredes [2011, 141-46]). We have kept a couple of simpler cooperative projects in the program, but have concluded that the compounding constraints of adult students in modular, standardized, accelerated, and compressed courses do not create a conducive environment for genuine collaboration.…”
Section: Frustrating Group Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It aims at creating interactive learning environments where learners engage in common tasks allowing them working together to create common understanding, meaning, and solutions as a result of a collaborative learning process (Dillenbourg, 1999). It is specifically effective in adult learning since the possibility of sharing personal experiences and connections contributes in fostering group engagement and promoting a supportive learning environment (Scherling, 2011).…”
Section: Building An Approach To Continuing Professional Development mentioning
confidence: 99%