“…22 Our process incorporated these four elements within the setting of a multidisciplinary team that reviewed local events on a frequent basis. 10 At the end of this process, the “Good Catch” award publicly recognized clinicians for their efforts in reporting hazards and leading initiatives to improve patient safety. Importantly, the “Good Catch” award was only awarded if the precipitating event/hazard underwent our process of multidisciplinary team review, involved of a range of stakeholders, resulted in the development of an initiative to mitigate the original hazard.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 All individuals who are familiar with the event context should participate in interpreting the hazard (i.e., those who can tease out the various human and organizational factors involved). 11 A diverse team can offer a comprehensive knowledge base.…”
Section: A Multiphase and Multidisciplinary Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The WPCST meets weekly to address perioperative issues related to safety, quality, efficiency, teamwork, and development of new surgical services. 10 …”
Section: Our Experience Using This Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weighted priority score calculations using a tool developed by the team are used to rank hazards so that the team can most efficiently use limited resources. 10 At the conclusion of the meeting, specific action items and a timetable are agreed upon. Follow-up dates are set to discuss progress at the next WPCST weekly meeting.…”
Section: Our Experience Using This Processmentioning
“…22 Our process incorporated these four elements within the setting of a multidisciplinary team that reviewed local events on a frequent basis. 10 At the end of this process, the “Good Catch” award publicly recognized clinicians for their efforts in reporting hazards and leading initiatives to improve patient safety. Importantly, the “Good Catch” award was only awarded if the precipitating event/hazard underwent our process of multidisciplinary team review, involved of a range of stakeholders, resulted in the development of an initiative to mitigate the original hazard.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 All individuals who are familiar with the event context should participate in interpreting the hazard (i.e., those who can tease out the various human and organizational factors involved). 11 A diverse team can offer a comprehensive knowledge base.…”
Section: A Multiphase and Multidisciplinary Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The WPCST meets weekly to address perioperative issues related to safety, quality, efficiency, teamwork, and development of new surgical services. 10 …”
Section: Our Experience Using This Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weighted priority score calculations using a tool developed by the team are used to rank hazards so that the team can most efficiently use limited resources. 10 At the conclusion of the meeting, specific action items and a timetable are agreed upon. Follow-up dates are set to discuss progress at the next WPCST weekly meeting.…”
Section: Our Experience Using This Processmentioning
“…Analysis of the event by a multidisciplinary perioperative quality improvement team of physicians, nurses, risk managers, and human factors engineers 4 revealed that, one week earlier, a certified registered nurse anesthetist (CRNA) had notified the team that cefazolin and vecuronium vials with a similar appearance were adjacent to one another in the automated medication dispenser. Investigation found that the current supply of vecuronium and cefazolin had look-alike packaging and that the vecuronium labeling was noncompliant with United States Pharmacopeia (USP) standards because “Paralyzing Agent” was not on the cap and the ferrule.…”
Section: Patient Case and Application Of The Quality Improvement Processmentioning
Medication errors due to look-alike drugs put patients at risk and can be fatal. Neuromuscular blocking agents, such as vecuronium, can cause awake-paralysis in patients if administered as a single agent. Recent literature reported six cases in which vecuronium was inadvertently administered instead of the antibiotic drug cefazolin. This article describes a standardized quality improvement process used at The Johns Hopkins Hospital that was locally implemented following an adverse drug event and culminated in a nationwide FDA-mandated drug recall of vecuronium.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.