Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
ObjectiveThe objective of the study was to investigate the application effect of scenario simulation teaching based on the Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) and direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) rating scales in urology clinical apprenticeship training.Materials and methodsA total of 32 students from the class of 2015–2017 who completed their traineeship in the Department of Urology of our hospital were selected and divided into a research group and a routine group. Routine teaching was implemented for the trainees in the control group, while situational simulation teaching based on the Mini-CEX and DOPS scoring scales was implemented for the trainees in the research group. The Mini-CEX and DOPS scores and student satisfaction were compared at the time of admission and discharge between the two groups.ResultsAt the time of admission, there was no statistically significant difference between the Mini-CEX and DOPS scores of the two groups of trainees (p > 0.05). However, at the time of discharge, the Mini-CEX and DOPS scores of the trainees in the study group were 53.21 ± 4.52 and 81.23 ± 3.57, respectively, which were significantly higher than those in the conventional group (p < 0.001), and the trainees in the study group’s satisfaction with teaching was (20.11 ± 2.31), which was significantly higher than that of the conventional group (p < 0.001).ConclusionImplementing scenario simulation teaching based on the Mini-CEX and DOPS rating scales in urology clinical traineeship can significantly improve trainees’ surgical skills while also leading to high levels of satisfaction with the teaching method.
ObjectiveThe objective of the study was to investigate the application effect of scenario simulation teaching based on the Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) and direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) rating scales in urology clinical apprenticeship training.Materials and methodsA total of 32 students from the class of 2015–2017 who completed their traineeship in the Department of Urology of our hospital were selected and divided into a research group and a routine group. Routine teaching was implemented for the trainees in the control group, while situational simulation teaching based on the Mini-CEX and DOPS scoring scales was implemented for the trainees in the research group. The Mini-CEX and DOPS scores and student satisfaction were compared at the time of admission and discharge between the two groups.ResultsAt the time of admission, there was no statistically significant difference between the Mini-CEX and DOPS scores of the two groups of trainees (p > 0.05). However, at the time of discharge, the Mini-CEX and DOPS scores of the trainees in the study group were 53.21 ± 4.52 and 81.23 ± 3.57, respectively, which were significantly higher than those in the conventional group (p < 0.001), and the trainees in the study group’s satisfaction with teaching was (20.11 ± 2.31), which was significantly higher than that of the conventional group (p < 0.001).ConclusionImplementing scenario simulation teaching based on the Mini-CEX and DOPS rating scales in urology clinical traineeship can significantly improve trainees’ surgical skills while also leading to high levels of satisfaction with the teaching method.
Introduction: Motivation from lecturers can improve research performance supported by Good University Governance (GUG) and Supervision in carrying out Research, Revealing data on improving lecturer research performance through motivation optimization. Objectives: The population in this study is all lecturers and education staff in the Midwifery Department of Semarang Poltekkes, consisting of 5 campuses. The sampling was lecturers and education staff who had conducted multi-stage research, as many as 82 people. Methods: This questionnaire is an instrument for Google Forms data Analysis analyzed with Path analysis. Results: significant the influence of GUG on research performance through. Motivation obtained a value of 0.15. The direct impact of Supervision on research performance received effective results with results of 0.929. The indirect influence of Supervision through Motivation on Lecturer Performance is known to have no significant effect, with a value of 0.28. Gug and Supervision through Motivation have no direct impact on research performance. Conclusions: Provide additional theories of Motivation related to the research performance of midwifery lecturers and decision-making in developing human resources in universities, especially in the field of research in the Midwifery Department.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.