Methodological Issues and Strategies in Clinical Research (4th Ed.).
DOI: 10.1037/14805-022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing better graphs by including distributional information and integrating words, numbers, and images.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In any case, they should be provided in manuscripts so that reviewers may see them, even if the editor declares there is not enough space in a publication for them. Last—but not least—Lane and Sandor () stated, “There is an understandable desire on the part of researchers to show their data in a positive light. As a result, some may resist showing distributional data that reveal the variability and possible irregularities not apparent in a plot of means.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In any case, they should be provided in manuscripts so that reviewers may see them, even if the editor declares there is not enough space in a publication for them. Last—but not least—Lane and Sandor () stated, “There is an understandable desire on the part of researchers to show their data in a positive light. As a result, some may resist showing distributional data that reveal the variability and possible irregularities not apparent in a plot of means.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SB is a useful graphical tool in that it keeps the graphical simplicity of the traditional boxplot and displays summary statistics around a broadly used estimator of location. Thus, the SB displays more information about data sets than graphical methods that are limited to conveying only means and error bars (e.g., bar plots or dynamite plots) (see Lane & Sándor, 2009). Additionally, the SB features accurate CIs that assist in making solid statistical inferences about results in the population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amounts or comparisons are often displayed with a bar plot ( Figure 1A), although numerous other options exist, including Cleveland dot plots and even heatmaps ( Figure 1F). Bar plots are among the most common geometry, along with lines, 9 although bar plots are noted for their very low data density 16 (i.e., low data-ink ratio). Geometries for amounts should only be used when the data do not have distributional information or uncertainty associated with them.…”
Section: Principle #3 Use An Effective Geometry and Show Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a good reminder to be very clear not only in stating what type of uncertainty you are sharing, but what the interpretation is. Others 16 even go so far as to recommend that standard error not be used because it does not provide clear information about standard errors of differences among means. One recommendation to go along with expressing uncertainty is, if possible, to show the data (see Use an Effective Geometry and Show Data).…”
Section: Principle #5 Include Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%