Designing better input support programs: Lessons from zinc subsidies in Andhra Pradesh, India

Abstract

India has one of the largest agricultural input support programs in the world, delivered in the form of subsidies to farmers, raising concerns about its sustainability. This paper evaluates the performance of one such support, the micronutrient subsidy program in the state of Andhra Pradesh (AP) and presents a case for providing this support in the form of direct cash transfers. Under the program, key soil micronutrients- zinc, boron, and gypsum were distributed free of cost to farmers living in micronutrient-deficient areas, with identification and targeting managed entirely by the state. We survey 1621 farmers, 61 agriculture extension officers, and 78 agriculture input dealers to assess the efficacy of the program and to identify bottlenecks preventing effective targeting, with a focus on zinc. We find that use of non-subsidized zinc is high in AP, and awareness of benefits of zinc and physical access to input dealer shops are significant predictors of zinc use. We argue that the free provision of micronutrients may have created demand among farmers, but there is little justification to continue subsidizing such a program at such high rates or resorting to public distribution. We find that micronutrient procurement and distribution has become a burden on extension staff and crowds out the private sector. Our analysis shows that the subsidy can benefit more farmers if it is channeled through the network of private fertilizer dealers. We use administrative data on budgetary outlays and digital soil maps to suggest fiscal redistribution in the form of direct cash transfers that may ensure more effective targeting at a lower cost to the state.

Women's access to agriculture extension amidst COVID-19: Insights from Gujarat, India and Dang, Nepal

“…4 ). This can be linked to constraints such as low educational attainment of those belonging to socially marginalized communities and limited access to productive resources including credit, land and human capital ( Krishna et al, 2019 ; Gupta et al, 2020 ; Anderson et al, 2006 ). However, in Dang, we find no ethnicity-based differences in primary source of agriculture information between the two predominant communities in our sample- Chhetris and Janjati (tribals).…”

Agronomic Biofortification of Zinc in Rice for Diminishing Malnutrition in South Asia

“…Thus, it forces strict rationing that often leads to its suboptimal allocation. For example, a recent study in Andhra Pradesh showed that an adequate amount of the free Zn is distributed to traditionally prosperous irrigated districts in contrast to regions where Zn deficiency is high [135]. Second, distributing subsidized or free Zn by the government crowds out commercial demand.…”

Efficacy of public spending for agricultural development in India: a disaggregate analysis contextualizing subsidies vs investment debate

“…To what extent agricultural growth is responsive to the provision of subsidies is an important research question as subsidies are often criticized for being less productive, poorly targeted, market distorting, financially and environmentally unsustainable and so on (Fan et al. , 2008; Gulati and Banerjee, 2016, 2018; Gupta et al., 2020; Akber and Paltasingh, 2020; Tandon and Aggarwal, 2021). As per Central Statistical Office, growth of the agricultural sector decelerated sharply following the reform period where 4.78% per annum growth achieved during eighth five-year plan (1992–1993 to 1996–1997) reduced to just 2.7% per annum during the last 12th five-year plan (2012–2013 to 2016–2017).…”