2016
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2015.2466677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing Coordinated Power System Stabilizers: A Reference Model Based Controller Design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The power system industry prefers the PSS in the form of a conventional lead‐lag compensator . A PSS with a single block of lead‐lag compensator as shown in Figure is considered here as CPSS=KPSS[]1+sT11+sT2[]sTw1+sTw. …”
Section: The Design Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The power system industry prefers the PSS in the form of a conventional lead‐lag compensator . A PSS with a single block of lead‐lag compensator as shown in Figure is considered here as CPSS=KPSS[]1+sT11+sT2[]sTw1+sTw. …”
Section: The Design Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, many classical methods prevalent in the literature require reduction of the system model before designing the controllers. Recently, in the frequency domain, model matching techniques are adopted for the realization of proportional integral derivative (PID) controller and for the design of PSS in power system applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is mainly because the amplitude-frequency characteristic will be affected little by the parameter variation but mostly influenced by the model structures (the practical PSS has a certain model structure) [7,10]. Limited by the unit security request and the calculation complexity constraint, no matter in the theory study [11,12] or the practical application [5,6,8,15], most optimization methods primarily focus on the parameter improvement of the phase shifters, while specific attention has been rarely paid to the DC blockers.…”
Section: Double Input Pssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although scholars have also developed a new improved PSS model with the double-signal input to optimize the low-frequency and high-frequency features [7,10], the new model is still in the theory demonstration period and relatively lacks implement basis. To make an improvement, researchers presented parameter optimization methods for PSS4B and have verified the effectiveness by simulations and experiments [11][12][13]. However, since PSS4B is based on a parallel connected mode and is much more complex [7,13], it has not yet been widely used in the practical engineering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is difficult for the PSS2B to meet the requirement of low-frequency gain because of its structure, which is limited by the critical gain of the high-frequency band. Although the latest proposed PSS4B introduces two variable inputs and multi-parallel branches to compensate for the drawback of the PSS2B, its phase relationships and parameter tuning are difficult to calculate [8][9][10], which leads to difficulties in engineering applications. Fortunately, the oscillation frequency of the local power system ranges from 0.2 Hz to 2 Hz with no ultra-low frequency, so the low-frequency oscillation of the full range can be effectively damped by PSS2B [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%