2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2015.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing eco-efficient crop rotations using life cycle assessment of crop combinations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
70
1
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
70
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in this study, land use changes have not been included in life cycle assessments, although diversification of crop rotations together with improved management may significantly impact carbon footprint (Zeijts et al, 1999;Nemecek et al, 2012Nemecek et al, , 2015, which may have introduced some uncertainty into the GHG emissions and carbon footprint calculations. Moreover, many studies have shown that soil organic carbon storage was increased in NT and high nitrogen fertilizer treatments (Baker et al, 2007;Blanco-Canqui and Lal, 2008;Kahlon et al, 2013;Ussir and Lal, 2009;West and Post, 2002;Zhang et al, 2013b).…”
Section: Potential Limitations Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, in this study, land use changes have not been included in life cycle assessments, although diversification of crop rotations together with improved management may significantly impact carbon footprint (Zeijts et al, 1999;Nemecek et al, 2012Nemecek et al, , 2015, which may have introduced some uncertainty into the GHG emissions and carbon footprint calculations. Moreover, many studies have shown that soil organic carbon storage was increased in NT and high nitrogen fertilizer treatments (Baker et al, 2007;Blanco-Canqui and Lal, 2008;Kahlon et al, 2013;Ussir and Lal, 2009;West and Post, 2002;Zhang et al, 2013b).…”
Section: Potential Limitations Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The production and use of mineral N fertilizer was associated with high environmental burdens and costs. Consequently, N fertilization was one of the key factors that influenced the environmental impact and economic efficiency of CRs 7. Within the same region, the N fertilization rate could vary widely between CRs; in particular, a high share of cereals in the CR could lead to a high N fertilization rate 7.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effective CR tends to reduce the input of crop protection agents and increase yields 6. Thus, the benefits of diverse CRs along with improved resource‐efficient management are key to sustainable EC management 7.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Switching from cereal-intensive crop rotations towards diverse cropping sequencing benefits the environment, e.g. through better nutrient management, reduced need for nitrogen (N) fertilizers, increased biodiversity, improved soil conditions and functions and reduced pest, disease and weed risks [68]. Especially N fixing legumes are appreciated as break-crops [911].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diversification is also one of the core means to increase resilience of crop production to weather variability [12]. To capitalize on the benefits from diversification and to better design crop rotations, eco-efficiency (the ratio between environmental impact and economic value) needs to be assessed [8]. Diversified land use is a key element of sustainable intensification of cropping systems, that need to be designed locally [13], to reduce yield gaps and gain environmental sustainability, economic profitability and social acceptability [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%