Strengths and limitations of this study► This was the first discrete choice experiment (DCE), and only the second stated preference study in the field of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). ► The study used unusual and innovative methodology by (1) using a Best-worst Scaling case 1 study in attribute selection, (2) having AAC system choices be made in the context of a child vignette formed from a set of attributes and (3) introducing a new measure termed relative interaction attribute importance to interpret results. ► Child vignettes were relatively simple, and a single vignette could represent children with very different needs. ► In some ways, the DCE task differed from how augmentative and alternative professionals make decisions in practice.
AbStrACtObjectives Many children with varied disabilities, for example, cerebral palsy, autism, can benefit from augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems. However, little is known about professionals' decision-making when recommending symbol based AAC systems for children. This study examines AAC professionals' preferences for attributes of AAC systems and how they interact with child characteristics.Design AAC professionals answered a discrete choice experiment survey with AAC system and child-related attributes, where participants chose an AAC system for a child vignette.Setting The survey was administered online in the UK.Participants 155 UK-based AAC professionals were recruited between 20 October 2017 and 4 March 2018.Outcomes The study outcomes were the preferences of AAC professionals' as quantified using a mixed logit model, with model selection performed using a step-wise procedure and the Bayesian Information Criterion. results Significant differences were observed in preferences for AAC system attributes, and large interactions were seen between child attributes included in the child vignettes, for example, participants made more ambitious choices for children who were motivated to communicate using AAC, and predicted to progress in skills and abilities. These characteristics were perceived as relatively more important than language ability and previous AAC experience.Conclusions AAC professionals make trade-offs between attributes of AAC systems, and these trade-offs change depending on the characteristics of the child for whom the system is being provided.