2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2010.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing efficient fusion schemes for multimodal biometric systems using face and palmprint

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
76
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, Eigen and Fisher always achieved 0% EER when fusing the palmprint with either the face or the fingerprint, regardless of the number of training samples. The results also confirmed Raghavendra et al (2011)'s assertion -the same feature transformation should be applied to different modalities.…”
Section: Preliminary Experiments For Developing the Guidelinessupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, Eigen and Fisher always achieved 0% EER when fusing the palmprint with either the face or the fingerprint, regardless of the number of training samples. The results also confirmed Raghavendra et al (2011)'s assertion -the same feature transformation should be applied to different modalities.…”
Section: Preliminary Experiments For Developing the Guidelinessupporting
confidence: 81%
“…However, based on the biometric, specific regions contain less noise and more discriminatory information. Considering the entire image during fusion, rather than core regions, can lead to the phenomenon known as "the curse of dimensionality problem" (Raghavendra et al, 2011). These regions are typically centred around the core for alignment during image registration.…”
Section: Feature Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, in [26], a user-specific weight strategy is used to compute the weighted sum of scores from different modalities. In general, the computation of weights is done based on the Equal Error Rate (EER), the distribution of scores, the quality of the individual biometrics or empirical schemes [5]. The Weighted Sum Rule (ws) of different score matchers can be calculated as:…”
Section: Match Score Level Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. : (20) Once the multiresolution wavelet coefficients of each image acquired by each sensor are obtained, high-and lowfrequency components can be postprocessed using specific fusion rules, such as addition, or weighted averaging. Fig.…”
Section: A Multiwavelength Digital Holographymentioning
confidence: 99%