2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2018.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing for Big Area Additive Manufacturing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such issues eventually result in a lack of reproducibility of the part quality over a prolonged production run [2], defects in the internal structure of the 3D-printed part [16], surface imperfections [17], or in the worst case a complete failure of the printing job due to filament buckling or annular backflow [14]. Another common cause for multiple processing attempts for the same component are novel, mostly unknown design constraints, such as the misuse of design parameters such as overhangs, support structures, bridges, cavities [18], or thin walls [19]. An additional underestimated problem is insufficient or over-adhesion during processing, which can result in extensive warpage or even damaged parts [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such issues eventually result in a lack of reproducibility of the part quality over a prolonged production run [2], defects in the internal structure of the 3D-printed part [16], surface imperfections [17], or in the worst case a complete failure of the printing job due to filament buckling or annular backflow [14]. Another common cause for multiple processing attempts for the same component are novel, mostly unknown design constraints, such as the misuse of design parameters such as overhangs, support structures, bridges, cavities [18], or thin walls [19]. An additional underestimated problem is insufficient or over-adhesion during processing, which can result in extensive warpage or even damaged parts [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even regardless of build chamber size restriction, an extended amount of time is required for the manufacturing of large-sized objects [30]. Nevertheless, a technology called Big Area Additive Manufacturing (BAAM), which was developed in recent years, has overcome this limitation by being able to create large-scale parts [66]. Most of the design and application constraints of small-scale AM still apply to BAAM as well [67].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The embossing resolution of the extra-toolpath geometry was dependent upon the melt pool size response time and the print speed. The ability of this technique to control local bead geometry has interesting implications, particularly for a large-scale AM process like laser-wire DED, which requires a different set of design rules than the majority of AM processes and has traditionally been limited to lower resolution of component details [13,14]. It is anticipated that the technique can be used in the near future for volumetric defect mitigation in toolpaths where local overlap of adjacent beads is inadequate.The capability to emboss specific, secondary geometry means that part identification features, such as a serial number or QR code, could be permanently added to components during the printing process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%