2016
DOI: 10.14434/ijdl.v7i2.20108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing for Consistent Implementation of a 5th Grade Digital Math Curriculum

Abstract: Reasoning Mind products are used by over 100,000 students a year and have shown positive outcomes. In this design case we focus on implementation: how Reasoning Mind’s approach evolved to tackle the challenge of achieving consistently high-quality implementations with many different schools, teachers, and students. Key insights include the definition of the Implementation Coordinator role and how that role is managed, the design and refinement of specific tools to support the implementation improvement process… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mind team exhibited a high ability to track whether the program is being delivered as expected and use this information to help teachers improve their practice (see Roschelle, Gaudino, & Darling, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mind team exhibited a high ability to track whether the program is being delivered as expected and use this information to help teachers improve their practice (see Roschelle, Gaudino, & Darling, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implementation coordinators could use these data as they observe classrooms and interact directly with teachers. Overall, the Reasoning Mind team exhibited a high ability to track whether the program is being delivered as expected and use this information to help teachers improve their practice (see Roschelle, Gaudino, & Darling, 2016).…”
Section: Detailed Discussion Of the Selection Of Reasoning Mindmentioning
confidence: 99%