1994
DOI: 10.1016/0263-8223(94)90003-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing for damage-tolerant composite repairs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…thirty eight wings with a total of seventy six doublers, there are two doublers per wing) were successfully proof loaded in the US and a further two wings passed a proof load test in Australia [14]. This led to an enunciation of the failure mechanisms for bonded composite joints and repairs to both civil infra-structure and military [15,16,17] and civil transport aircraft [19] and to the development of validated design criteria for composite repairs [17,18,19]. Figure 4 presents a typical failure surface associated with boron epoxy repairs to aluminium structures, from [15].…”
Section: First Ply Failurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…thirty eight wings with a total of seventy six doublers, there are two doublers per wing) were successfully proof loaded in the US and a further two wings passed a proof load test in Australia [14]. This led to an enunciation of the failure mechanisms for bonded composite joints and repairs to both civil infra-structure and military [15,16,17] and civil transport aircraft [19] and to the development of validated design criteria for composite repairs [17,18,19]. Figure 4 presents a typical failure surface associated with boron epoxy repairs to aluminium structures, from [15].…”
Section: First Ply Failurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peak adhesive shear stress was less than 25 MPa and was below the endurance level of the thin film adhesive FM73, see 130], indicating that the repair should not debond and should be inherently damage tolerant, see [30]. The stress concentration around the damage was also found to be very localised and was consistent with the experimentally measured thermal emission profile [29], as well as with the experimentally measured values of strain and compliance.…”
Section: Reduction In Strain Due To An External Doublermentioning
confidence: 53%
“…This indicates that there was little deterioration in the bond strength over this time. Normal repair methodologies that utilize doubler stiffness ratios of 0.8 to 1.0, would produce load transfer ratios in the 40-60% range [6,19,20]. However, since this repair has a lower stiffness ratio of 0.3, the resulting stresses in the doubler are higher as shown in the graphs.…”
Section: The Curves Indicate That the Load Transfer Into The Doubler mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, an increased emphasis is placed on quantifying the probability that a flaw of a particular size and location will be detected by a piece of NDT equipment. In addition to this report, detailed discussions on general damage tolerance assessments for structural repairs are presented in references [15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Doubler Design Guidelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%