2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing for engagement: A Realist Synthesis Review of how context affects the outcomes of multi-stakeholder forums on land use and/or land-use change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
16
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…By using a local community approach, local actors can easily have an impact on policymaking [17], and given the support of the local government their role becomes most crucial in every issue of land management [18]. Hence, local actors are perceived to be elites in the local level political arena [18][19][20][21]. However, the presence of local actors is not limited to being elitists, as they often serve the local population [22,23].…”
Section: Literature Review Social Fire Network Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using a local community approach, local actors can easily have an impact on policymaking [17], and given the support of the local government their role becomes most crucial in every issue of land management [18]. Hence, local actors are perceived to be elites in the local level political arena [18][19][20][21]. However, the presence of local actors is not limited to being elitists, as they often serve the local population [22,23].…”
Section: Literature Review Social Fire Network Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To shift from seeing context as an obstacle, multi-stakeholder forums (MSFs) are receiving attention due to the need to address climate change and transform development trajectories [64]. A study from CIFOR emphasized that the most successful multi-stakeholder forums are those that are recognized as part of a wider process that seeks to transform practices at multiple levels and are focused upon building consensus and commitment from higher levels, political will, and are designed as adaptive learning processes [65].…”
Section: Changing the Game In The Brazilian Amazon: Why A Change Is Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that sense, understanding participation as a medium/long-term target and accepting a certain level of tradeoff between inclusiveness and effectiveness would be a more pragmatic approach. This is particularly relevant in cases where deforestation drivers are associated with specific local groups or where unequal power relations between actors with conflicting priorities may jeopardize processes (Rodriguez-Ward et al, 2018;Sarmiento-Barletti et al, 2020).…”
Section: How Should Tradeoffs Between Inclusiveness and Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%